HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
laravel
framework
PHP2013–2026
laravel / framework

framework

Laravel is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax.

34Distinct people
38Mentions
1Explicit recommenders
35KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Laravel is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

I love Laravel, it's the simplest and most expressive PHP framework that I've used, and it does everything I want it to do out of the box. I really like that Laravel 4's API is…

wldlyinaccurate used a recommendation phrase. One indexed comment matches. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 7:56:55 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year38 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2013-01-11 19:52:57 UTC to 2026-10-20 04:39:43 UTC.

02462013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 comments20132014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 0 submissions, 7 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 2 submissions, 5 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC514
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC707
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC725
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC312
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211

What Hacker News says

7 sources
Fair enough, you seem to have contributed quite a bit to the framework after all [1]. However, don't you think they have gotten better with triaging as of late? Also, I'm wondering, does your criticism still apply to the latest versions of Laravel or does it stem from frustrations with the pre-5.0 versions? Regarding your comments about the lack of interfaces, it's worth mentioning that at least the core components do have an interface now [2]. [1] https://github.com/laravel/framework/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=... [2] https://laravel.com/docs/master/contracts#contract-reference
In Ask HN: What are examples of GitHub repositories with high code quality?
The Laravel framework [1]. It makes the most of the latest features available in PHP (reflection, traits, namespacing, etc.) and its author, Taylor Otwell, has an almost obsessive attitude with the naming of methods and formatting of the source code. For instance, every multiline comment is exactly three lines long, and every line is three characters shorter than the previous one [2]. [1] https://github.com/laravel/framework [2] https://www.reddit.com/r/laravel/comments/20ovey/just_notice...
In Ask HN: What are examples of GitHub repositories with high code quality?
For some reason, PHP is not just a language, it's a spirit of writing bad software. A few weeks back I needed to port some crypto from Laravel to Go. I did not have too much trouble – apart the strange usage of Rijndael-256 that Laravel had until one version or two ago. When I looked at the way they were using keys to encrypt data, I realized that they were directly using "application private key". Is that bad? It shouldn't, but Laravel makes sure all the keys it generates are ASCII, for copy/pasting convenience. What happens if you're using a 256-bit key that can be represented with ASCII? The key space is 10^20 times smaller (the entropy of a byte in the key goes from 256 to 62!). That's been a thing in the most "modern framework" in PHP for more than three years. I'm far from being a security professional, but spending one hour on one
Read the rest
file was enough to find a basic security issue. Let's just say we're not writing code with Laravel anymore. I must mention that Taylor Otwell (the author) was extremely fast for fixing the problem. He is probably among the best open source project maintainers I know, and desserves to live off this work on Laravel. Here is the commit: https://github.com/laravel/framework/commit/370ae34d41362c3a...
In Laravel Spark 1.0 is now available
Sure! A great example is the actual code we are using now. We are based on the Laravel framework so here is the driver code laravel uses. https://github.com/laravel/framework/tree/5.2/src/Illuminate... You'll notice there is an abstract class "Transport.php" which declares certain methods (via the Swift_Transport interface class) that the "MandrillTransport", "MailgunTransport" and the "SesTransport" must all implement. > I think case in point, free is not forever in SaaS business. Our account & our customers' accounts were all paid. Some of them send up to 500,000 emails each per month. I would have been fine with them getting rid of the free tier, its the TOS change for marketing emails that killed our use with them.
In The rise of the API-based SaaS

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.