MAmaydemir·Apr 10, 2022Submission
Jetstream – Tailwind scaffolding for the Laravel framework
2 points · Open discussionlaravel
jetstream
PHP2021–2022
laravel / jetstream
jetstream
Tailwind scaffolding for the Laravel framework.
2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
4.1KGitHub stars
What to know before exploring
What it is
Tailwind scaffolding for the Laravel framework.
GitHub
Where it is used
No documented product use has been verified yet.
What people are saying
No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.
No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.
Also in these discussions
No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.
This week on Hacker News
Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.
No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.
Mentions over time
HN mentions by week2 dated mentions
Observed mentions: 2021-10-13 10:59:05 UTC to 2022-04-10 09:00:26 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.
Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.
View mention counts and date ranges
| Period | Start (UTC) | End (exclusive, UTC) | Mentions | Submissions | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11 | 2021-10-11 00:00:00 UTC | 2021-10-18 00:00:00 UTC | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Oct 18 | 2021-10-18 00:00:00 UTC | 2021-10-25 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct 25 | 2021-10-25 00:00:00 UTC | 2021-11-01 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 1 | 2021-11-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2021-11-08 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 8 | 2021-11-08 00:00:00 UTC | 2021-11-15 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 15 | 2021-11-15 00:00:00 UTC | 2021-11-22 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 22 | 2021-11-22 00:00:00 UTC | 2021-11-29 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov 29 | 2021-11-29 00:00:00 UTC | 2021-12-06 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dec 6 | 2021-12-06 00:00:00 UTC | 2021-12-13 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dec 13 | 2021-12-13 00:00:00 UTC | 2021-12-20 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dec 20 | 2021-12-20 00:00:00 UTC | 2021-12-27 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dec 27 | 2021-12-27 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-01-03 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 3 | 2022-01-03 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-01-10 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 10 | 2022-01-10 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-01-17 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 17 | 2022-01-17 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-01-24 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 24 | 2022-01-24 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-01-31 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jan 31 | 2022-01-31 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-02-07 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 7 | 2022-02-07 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-02-14 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 14 | 2022-02-14 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-02-21 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 21 | 2022-02-21 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-02-28 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Feb 28 | 2022-02-28 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-03-07 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 7 | 2022-03-07 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-03-14 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 14 | 2022-03-14 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-03-21 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 21 | 2022-03-21 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-03-28 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar 28 | 2022-03-28 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-04-04 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Apr 4 | 2022-04-04 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-04-11 00:00:00 UTC | 1 | 1 | 0 |
What Hacker News says
2 sourcesI get your point and this conversation might be as old as Laravel itself. I would like to point out a couple of things though:
The "hop in and be productive" part is directly related to Laravel being pretty opinionated. It's hard to have the one without the other. I think it's comparable to Steve Jobs, who had pretty strong opinions about certain things, too. The end result is a "product" that doesn't try to be the right fit for everyone.
Livewire, just like Jetstream[1] etc. is opt-in. When Jetstream was introduced, there was quite an uproar (by parts of the community) about Laravel forcing users into Livewire or Inertia[2]. The end result was (imho) a very healthy shift in communication around it (to emphasize the opt-in part), followed by the introduction of Breeze[3], which goes to show that Taylor does recognize the reservations some
Read the rest
people may have about those new shiny toys.
It's a very natural thing that big projects like that will have an ever-growing feature set. That is an important part of keeping existing users excited. The Jetstream-discussion has been an important lesson for the team (I hope) and I'm glad it ended the way it did.
You can still build your Laravel app in a pretty similar fashion as you would have done 5 years ago and if you want, you can make use of the recent additions, so I think there's not too much to worry about to be honest. If you have outgrown the magic, isn't it pretty amazing that you can drop down one level of abstraction and just use symfony? Also, do you think you would've grasped many of the underlying features of symfony, if it wasn't for Laravel's opinionated wrapping in a nicer syntax (pardon my oversimplification)?
Nevertheless, I think it's good to keep up the warning signs and have this discussion from time to time. ;-)
[1] https://github.com/laravel/jetstream
[2] https://inertiajs.com/
[3] https://github.com/laravel/breeze