HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
linux-surface
surface-pro-x
Systems & Infrastructure2023–2026
linux-surface / surface-pro-x

surface-pro-x

Tracking and meta repository for Surface Pro X support.

5Distinct people
9Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
102GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Tracking and meta repository for Surface Pro X support.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year9 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2023-04-10 14:29:30 UTC to 2026-06-01 23:30:00 UTC.

0123452023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 0 submissions, 5 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20242025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC505
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

9 sources
The Surface line is, HW-wise, very good IMHO. Too bad the software is awful. Thankfully the Linux Surface community is pretty strong. Proprietary Microsoft drivers don't make it easy, but we're getting there... https://github.com/linux-surface/surface-pro-x I'll buy another one if there's some commitment from Microsoft to be more open source friendly, but since this will never happen, they can keep their HW.
In Microsoft builds MacBook Pro rival with NVIDIA-powered Surface Laptop Ultra
Surface Pro X here, the support is meh (see https://github.com/linux-surface/surface-pro-x/issues/7) but good enough to use it casually as a second computer. In my case the biggest drawback is not being able to use an external screen via HDMI and the sound support (although you can workaround that with BT). Let's not talk about widevine, I managed to eventually get it to work but it was very painful. If we get full audio support and solve some of the widevine issues, this can easily become a daily driver for when I'm traveling or giving presentations.
In Linux on Snapdragon X Elite: Linaro and Tuxedo Pave the Way for ARM64 Laptops
> When the X13S Snapdragon released I seem to remember it shipping with first-party Linux drivers for almost everything Nope. 2 years on there's still no webcam support for this device [1], though it is in a lot better place than it was on launch (not being able to boot at all on mainline). The Surface Pro X still seems to be a long way off [2]. [1]: https://www.reddit.com/r/linuxhardware/comments/17tw6ag/anyo... [2]: https://github.com/linux-surface/surface-pro-x/issues/7
In Conformant OpenGL 4.6 on the M1
The sad part about all of this is that generally the contributions for these kind of things do not come from the vendor, but from "volunteers". See for example the kernel patches done to support the Surface Pro X: https://github.com/linux-surface/surface-pro-x Half of them are from Maximilian Luz (@qzed, student), the other half are from Bjorn Andersson (@andersson, Linaro). All of the hard work is done by them, instead of Qualcomm / Microsoft. The same applies for the rest of the ARM ecosystem :( Another great example is Asahi Linux: the port was only possible because someone decided to reverse engineer the work of Apple - not because Apple wanted it.
In Acer Aspire 1 ARM Laptop Has Nearly Complete Upstream Linux Support

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.