polyshell

Ok well this doesn’t work on Mac, so much for not needing to cross-compile on every architecture. It’s because of the OSX Gatekeeper but if majority of people need to self-sign or otherwise compile this binary I’m not sure if it is that portable be it if it’s only a Mac thing. This dumps the zip content directly on the wire skipping an extra kernel write. There have been attempts before to run the same binary on multiple architectures by inserting magic headers without having to recompile. There are shell/batch versions of the same thing [0]. The issue is such projects usually never get much traction since every programmer is wedded to their choice of OS and typically relies on APIs specific to each system. There are also “fat binaries” which accomplish the same thing if one truly wanted a cross platform single executable. There isn’t a h

This is something like a "fat binary" with some magic in the header that allows it to run out of the box on Windows and several different UNIXes, a bit like those sneaky shell scripts that run on several platforms[0]. It still needs to include some native code for each of the platforms inside the compiled binary, so it's perhaps better to see it as a slick packaging/distribution solution for C programmers than a total game changer for developers everywhere. The more interesting thing I think is the mapping of C library functionality between Linux, BSD and Windows. There have been other attempts to do this, but they never seem to get much traction. I think it's because C programmers tend to get wedded to their OS of choice and then invest time in improving that platform's C libraries. The problem with trying to remain portable with everyth