HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
llvm-mirror
clang
C++2013–2020
llvm-mirror / clang · Archived

clang

Mirror kept for legacy. Moved to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project

13Distinct people
18Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
3KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Mirror kept for legacy. Moved to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 9:28:18 AM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year18 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2013-03-20 17:57:46 UTC to 2020-09-10 00:24:12 UTC.

012342013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20132014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments20162017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2020

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

4 sources
You can make pretty much anything seem equivalent if you abstract it enough. You've basically just equated MVC with any program that does IO. I can't see how that's a useful thing to do. Just looking at what you said though: why would you represent a transformation (something inherently a verb/action) as a model? "Model - Input -> output format transformation". It operates on models, it's not A model. Also, claiming the view as input/output is pretty reductive. How do I represent a lexer as a view? More importantly, why would I want to? Fun experiment, find the views and controllers in here: https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang
In MVVM is Exceptionally OK
gcc and clang have optional warnings for some of these issues, without needing to use clang-tidy. For NULL, 0, and nullptr, gcc and clang already treat NULL as a magic __null value and -Wconversion-null (enabled by default) can warn about using NULL as a non-pointer value. gcc also can break 0-as-a-null-pointer with the -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant flag. I had hoped to fix these warnings in Firefox (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777515) bug there were thousands of warnings because gcc warns about using NULL, not just 0. For override, gcc has -Wsuggest-override and -Woverloaded-virtual warnings that may help here. clang has -Winconsistent-missing-override. For uninitialized variables, gcc and clang have -Wuninitialized. However, gcc -Wuninitialized has historically reported a lot of false positives. Fortunately, recent gc
Read the rest
c version moved the flakier uninitialized warnings to a new -Wmaybe-uninitialized flag. In my experience with Firefox, -Wmaybe-uninitialized warnings are false positives about 90% of the time. On the other hand, clang has a -Wsometimes-uninitialized which is reliable. For bool++, clang has -Wdeprecated-increment-bool. btw, clang does not document its warning flags, but some resources I've used are the http://fuckingclangwarnings.com/ reference, searching through clang's source code at https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/blob/master/include/cla..., and clang's -Weverything flag (which truly is everything, including contradictory warnings).
In Breaking all the Eggs in C++
Yes, I think of Rust as a promising target for parser generators. Thinking about text parsing, if Bison generated Rust, then you'd have a memory-safe parser that should be about as efficient as C. Something like this probably already exists or is being worked on. Ideally existing code generators could target Rust also to get memory safety. There are some SIMD optimizations in parsers though that I don't know how easily you could express in Rust. The quintessential example of this for text parsing is Clang's optimization that uses SSE to skip over C++ comments 16 bytes at a time: https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/blob/61f6bf2c8a8e94c4fa...
In “Land initial Rust MP4 parser and unit tests”

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.