HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
loda-lang
loda-cpp
C++2021–2021
loda-lang / loda-cpp

loda-cpp

Runtime and miner for the LODA language written in C++

Languages & Compilers
Explore on GitHubRead Hacker News discussions
2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
28GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Runtime and miner for the LODA language written in C++

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by 3-hour interval2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2021-09-25 14:17:38 UTC to 2021-09-29 07:02:06 UTC.

012021-09-25 12:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-25 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsSep 25, 12:002021-09-25 15:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-25 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-25 18:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-25 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-25 21:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-26 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-26 03:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-26 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-26 06:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-26 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-26 09:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-26 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-26 12:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-26 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-26 15:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-26 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-26 18:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-26 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-26 21:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-27 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-27 03:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-27 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-27 06:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-27 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-27 09:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-27 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsSep 27, 09:002021-09-27 12:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-27 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-27 15:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-27 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-27 18:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-27 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-27 21:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-28 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-28 03:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-28 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-28 06:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-28 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-28 09:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-28 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-28 12:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-28 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-28 15:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-28 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-28 18:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-28 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-28 21:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-29 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-29 03:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-29 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-09-29 06:00:00 UTC to 2021-09-29 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsSep 29, 06:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Sep 25, 12:002021-09-25 12:00:00 UTC2021-09-25 15:00:00 UTC101
Sep 25, 15:002021-09-25 15:00:00 UTC2021-09-25 18:00:00 UTC000
Sep 25, 18:002021-09-25 18:00:00 UTC2021-09-25 21:00:00 UTC000
Sep 25, 21:002021-09-25 21:00:00 UTC2021-09-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 26, 00:002021-09-26 00:00:00 UTC2021-09-26 03:00:00 UTC000
Sep 26, 03:002021-09-26 03:00:00 UTC2021-09-26 06:00:00 UTC000
Sep 26, 06:002021-09-26 06:00:00 UTC2021-09-26 09:00:00 UTC000
Sep 26, 09:002021-09-26 09:00:00 UTC2021-09-26 12:00:00 UTC000
Sep 26, 12:002021-09-26 12:00:00 UTC2021-09-26 15:00:00 UTC000
Sep 26, 15:002021-09-26 15:00:00 UTC2021-09-26 18:00:00 UTC000
Sep 26, 18:002021-09-26 18:00:00 UTC2021-09-26 21:00:00 UTC000
Sep 26, 21:002021-09-26 21:00:00 UTC2021-09-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 27, 00:002021-09-27 00:00:00 UTC2021-09-27 03:00:00 UTC000
Sep 27, 03:002021-09-27 03:00:00 UTC2021-09-27 06:00:00 UTC000
Sep 27, 06:002021-09-27 06:00:00 UTC2021-09-27 09:00:00 UTC000
Sep 27, 09:002021-09-27 09:00:00 UTC2021-09-27 12:00:00 UTC000
Sep 27, 12:002021-09-27 12:00:00 UTC2021-09-27 15:00:00 UTC000
Sep 27, 15:002021-09-27 15:00:00 UTC2021-09-27 18:00:00 UTC000
Sep 27, 18:002021-09-27 18:00:00 UTC2021-09-27 21:00:00 UTC000
Sep 27, 21:002021-09-27 21:00:00 UTC2021-09-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 28, 00:002021-09-28 00:00:00 UTC2021-09-28 03:00:00 UTC000
Sep 28, 03:002021-09-28 03:00:00 UTC2021-09-28 06:00:00 UTC000
Sep 28, 06:002021-09-28 06:00:00 UTC2021-09-28 09:00:00 UTC000
Sep 28, 09:002021-09-28 09:00:00 UTC2021-09-28 12:00:00 UTC000
Sep 28, 12:002021-09-28 12:00:00 UTC2021-09-28 15:00:00 UTC000
Sep 28, 15:002021-09-28 15:00:00 UTC2021-09-28 18:00:00 UTC000
Sep 28, 18:002021-09-28 18:00:00 UTC2021-09-28 21:00:00 UTC000
Sep 28, 21:002021-09-28 21:00:00 UTC2021-09-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 29, 00:002021-09-29 00:00:00 UTC2021-09-29 03:00:00 UTC000
Sep 29, 03:002021-09-29 03:00:00 UTC2021-09-29 06:00:00 UTC000
Sep 29, 06:002021-09-29 06:00:00 UTC2021-09-29 09:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
nixpulvis·Sep 25, 2021
Neat. How many of the solution programs were originally hand-written vs machine generated from other known solutions or actually "mined"? Reading through https://github.com/loda-lang/loda-cpp/blob/main/miners.defau..., it seems like the "template" for each generator could have been minted one way or another. I'm a little curious now... It's kinda fun to see a program minimizer in ~200LoC++, but I wonder what other optimization tricks would be worth implementing for the purposes of integer sequence search? I wonder if it would be worth wiring up a proper compiler framework? Or are there other projects that already do this kind of thing faster? Instead of just "matching" it might be cool to sort these solutions by similarity and then compare that to the similarity of the sequences themselves. Finally, given that the OEIS databases exists wi
Read the rest
th "FORMULA" (on every entry?), wouldn't it be faster to just parse that? Maybe you'd find some bugs?
In Loda-lang – language, computational model, and OEIS miner

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.