AZazhenley·May 11, 2026Submission
1 points · Open discussionlorin
resilience-engineering
Science & Engineering2018–2026
lorin / resilience-engineering
resilience-engineering
Resilience engineering papers
9Distinct people
12Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
3.1KGitHub stars
What to know before exploring
What it is
Resilience engineering papers
GitHub
Where it is used
No documented product use has been verified yet.
What people are saying
No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.
No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.
Also in these discussions
No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.
This week on Hacker News
Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.
No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.
Mentions over time
HN mentions by year12 dated mentions
Observed mentions: 2018-12-29 08:54:17 UTC to 2026-05-11 06:21:53 UTC.
* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.
Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.
View mention counts and date ranges
| Period | Start (UTC) | End (exclusive, UTC) | Mentions | Submissions | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2019 | 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 6 | 4 | 2 |
| 2020 | 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2021 | 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| 2023 | 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2025 | 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 (partial) | 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC | 1 | 1 | 0 |
What Hacker News says
12 sourcesThis is pretty much true for any touchy subject where the mission (say infosec) isn’t actually aligned with org motives (say cutting costs at the same time as increasing profits).
The result is basically theater where doublethink and doublespeak becomes the norm, and to stick around you have to care more about the theater and the least onerous interpretations of the letter of any applicable law more than the spirit it was intended.
See also [1] for a really pragmatic way of thinking about the realities of a sustainable safety culture
[1] https://github.com/lorin/resilience-engineering/raw/master/b...
In Sam and Greg's response to OpenAI Safety researcher claimsLorin/resilience-engineering: Resilience engineering papers
1 points · Open discussionI can not advise something more strongly than the Etsy's Debriefing Facilitation Guide.
https://codeascraft.com/2016/11/17/debriefing-facilitation-g...
This come from the field of Resiliency Engineering, if you want to learn more about that kind of thinking, i advise to have a look at https://github.com/lorin/resilience-engineering/blob/master/...
In Cast Handbook: How to Learn More from Incidents and Accidents [pdf]A good starting point is https://github.com/lorin/resilience-engineering/blob/master/...
My email is in my profile if you want to go deeper :)
In How Complex Systems Fail (1998) [pdf]Resilience engineering: Where do I start?
167 points · Open discussionResilience engineering: Where do I start?
1 points · Open discussionNotes about people active in resilience engineering
3 points · Open discussion