HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
lpsantil
rt0
C2015–2023
lpsantil / rt0

rt0

A minimal C runtime for Linux i386 & x86_64

2Distinct people
16Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
586GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A minimal C runtime for Linux i386 & x86_64

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year16 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-01-29 18:02:59 UTC to 2023-10-19 23:02:30 UTC.

024682015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 2 submissions, 6 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2023

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC826
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404

What Hacker News says

16 sources
I’d also argue > decent amount of stuff that CAN be done in _start before you run main It’s all optional. Before I found the Linux kernel’s nolibc [0], I wrote a minimal C runtime based on bunch of stuff I read [1]. Only thing you really need to do is align the stack (at least on x86, amd64). You don’t get argc/argv/envp but main will still work. [0] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/master/tools/include/... [1] https://github.com/lpsantil/rt0/blob/master/src/lib/00_start...
In A Linking Adventure
A little self promotion but mostly because it addresses some of the other commenters concerns about malloc (or the lower-level api around sbrk): a couple years ago I wrote rt0 [0], a small (mostly minimal) C runtime for i386 & amd64 that makes it easier to replace libc & crt0 (as long as you have the kernel headers installed). Also, as part of the examples, I wrote wrappers around the sbrk syscall. Pretty easy to do and all documented in the repo. I expect to eventually port the lib to arm (raspberry pi) and aarm64. There's also lots of references to other small c runtimes. I'll be adding this one as well. [0] https://github.com/lpsantil/rt0
In Writing C software without the standard library
For me, I remember the notation by correlating it to its "high-level" equivalent. mov eax, [ ptr ] is like eax = *ptr; // or, eax = ptr[ 0 ]; The offset/multiplier memory addressing format for AT&T syntax was always more troubling for me. Coming from a TASM/MASM/NASM/PASCAL/x86 background first, it felt "icky" to put offsets outside of the "brackets" (or parenthesis, as it were) [0][1]. [0] https://github.com/lpsantil/rt0/blob/master/src/lib/00_start... [1] https://github.com/lpsantil/rt0/blob/master/src/lib/00_start...
In “Hello World” in assembly language on Linux
I like your watch target. I implemented something similar [0] with watch (bash builtin or GNU watch) & time. start_ci: watch time -p make clean all & echo $$! > tmp.ci.pid stop_ci: kill -9 `cat tmp.ci.pid` Then you can start continuous integration by doing make start_ci Then you can stop continuous integration by doing make stop_ci Obviously, this is inspired by rc.d scripts. [0] https://github.com/lpsantil/rt0/blob/master/Makefile#L117
In “The GNU Make Book”: probably more than you ever wanted to know about make

Showing the 15 most recent of 16 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.