HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
MantechUser
aes-finder
C++2020–2020
MantechUser / aes-finder

aes-finder

Utility to find AES keys in running processes

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
336GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Utility to find AES keys in running processes

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2020-09-05 18:29:04 UTC to 2020-09-06 15:18:45 UTC.

012020-09-05 18:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-05 19:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsSep 5, 18:002020-09-05 19:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-05 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-05 20:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-05 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-05 21:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-05 22:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-05 22:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-05 23:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-05 23:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-06 01:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-06 01:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-06 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-06 02:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-06 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-06 03:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-06 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-06 04:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-06 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsSep 6, 04:002020-09-06 05:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-06 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-06 06:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-06 07:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-06 07:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-06 08:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-06 08:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-06 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-06 09:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-06 10:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-06 10:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-06 11:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-06 11:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-06 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-06 12:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-06 13:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-06 13:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-06 14:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-06 14:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-06 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-09-06 15:00:00 UTC to 2020-09-06 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsSep 6, 15:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Sep 5, 18:002020-09-05 18:00:00 UTC2020-09-05 19:00:00 UTC110
Sep 5, 19:002020-09-05 19:00:00 UTC2020-09-05 20:00:00 UTC000
Sep 5, 20:002020-09-05 20:00:00 UTC2020-09-05 21:00:00 UTC000
Sep 5, 21:002020-09-05 21:00:00 UTC2020-09-05 22:00:00 UTC000
Sep 5, 22:002020-09-05 22:00:00 UTC2020-09-05 23:00:00 UTC000
Sep 5, 23:002020-09-05 23:00:00 UTC2020-09-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 6, 00:002020-09-06 00:00:00 UTC2020-09-06 01:00:00 UTC000
Sep 6, 01:002020-09-06 01:00:00 UTC2020-09-06 02:00:00 UTC000
Sep 6, 02:002020-09-06 02:00:00 UTC2020-09-06 03:00:00 UTC000
Sep 6, 03:002020-09-06 03:00:00 UTC2020-09-06 04:00:00 UTC000
Sep 6, 04:002020-09-06 04:00:00 UTC2020-09-06 05:00:00 UTC000
Sep 6, 05:002020-09-06 05:00:00 UTC2020-09-06 06:00:00 UTC000
Sep 6, 06:002020-09-06 06:00:00 UTC2020-09-06 07:00:00 UTC000
Sep 6, 07:002020-09-06 07:00:00 UTC2020-09-06 08:00:00 UTC000
Sep 6, 08:002020-09-06 08:00:00 UTC2020-09-06 09:00:00 UTC000
Sep 6, 09:002020-09-06 09:00:00 UTC2020-09-06 10:00:00 UTC000
Sep 6, 10:002020-09-06 10:00:00 UTC2020-09-06 11:00:00 UTC000
Sep 6, 11:002020-09-06 11:00:00 UTC2020-09-06 12:00:00 UTC000
Sep 6, 12:002020-09-06 12:00:00 UTC2020-09-06 13:00:00 UTC110
Sep 6, 13:002020-09-06 13:00:00 UTC2020-09-06 14:00:00 UTC000
Sep 6, 14:002020-09-06 14:00:00 UTC2020-09-06 15:00:00 UTC000
Sep 6, 15:002020-09-06 15:00:00 UTC2020-09-06 16:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
I took a skim of the source[1] -- I think that it's looking for an expanded set of round keys[2] using their expected layout in memory (accounting for endian flips, forward/reverse ordering, 128/192/256 bit variants, and enc/dec). If a matching region of memory is found, the first round key is the main key. [1]: https://github.com/MantechUser/aes-finder/blob/master/aes-fi... [2]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AES_key_schedule
In AES Finder – the utility to find AES keys in running process memory

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.