HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
manticoresoftware
manticoresearch
C++2018–2025
manticoresoftware / manticoresearch

manticoresearch

Open-source search database for full-text, vector, and hybrid search with real-time indexing and SQL.

11Distinct people
18Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
12.1KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Open-source search database for full-text, vector, and hybrid search with real-time indexing and SQL.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year18 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-11-13 16:35:49 UTC to 2025-08-09 04:21:04 UTC.

0123452018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20212022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 2 submissions, 1 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC514
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC321

What Hacker News says

18 sources
I don't believe there is just one answer to that, because it really depends on your needs, existing stack, and skillset. Disclaimer aside, I've heard very positive things about the search that ships with PostgreSQL, and similarly positive things for the few search extensions one can add (assuming extensions are available where you're running PG) https://github.com/quickwit-oss/tantivy#features seems to be a good starting place if you want to embed search, and its https://github.com/quickwit-oss/quickwit friend comes up a lot, but be sure to bear its AGPL license in mind Toshi is one of the ones which is striving for ES compatibility at the search level, making it a drop-in replacement https://github.com/toshi-search/Toshi#example-queries although last time I played with it, they were QUITE A WAYS away, depending on how deep one is in the
Read the rest
ES query DSL And then just last week <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41797041> we were blessed with Nixiesearch <https://github.com/nixiesearch/nixiesearch> which is a pretty specialized engine but will almost certainly be less resource intensive than Elastic (or it's FOSS friend OpenSearch) Browsing https://github.com/topics/search-engine I was reminded about a bunch that I either haven't tried or I tried so long ago I don't recall their pro/con lists https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch https://github.com/typesense/typesense https://github.com/qdrant/qdrant https://github.com/valeriansaliou/sonic https://github.com/manticoresoftware/manticoresearch
In Huly – Open-source project management platform
> We filtered out PISA Search and Manticore because neither of them offers search-as-you-type and facet search features Manticore does support facet search and it's quite powerful in Manticore: - docs - https://manual.manticoresearch.com/Searching/Faceted_search#... - interactive course - https://play.manticoresearch.com/faceting/ Search-as-you-type depends more on the client, not on the backend. However, Manticore provides the autocomplete and fuzzy features (both in beta stage though). More info here https://github.com/manticoresoftware/manticoresearch/issues/...
In We Chose Meilisearch over 10 Other Search Engines Despite a Major Drawback
Here's a sampling of stuff I've semi-recently encountered on Github that all spy on you by default. For some, it's undocumented, for others it's a minor subsection in the docs. (Some of them are source-available not free, I didn't keep track as I collected the URLs.) https://github.com/zed-industries/zed https://github.com/microsoft/vscode https://github.com/keystonejs/keystone https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine https://github.com/manticoresoftware/manticoresearch/ https://github.com/coder/code-server https://github.com/loft-sh/devpod https://github.com/quickwit-oss/quickwit https://github.com/rilldata/rill-developer/ https://github.com/hocus-dev/hocus https://github.com/firezone/firezone Here's a write-up of how bad it gets -- it's pretty obnoxious: https://www.roboleary.net/tools/2022/04/
Read the rest
In Mobifree – An open-source mobile ecosystem
MySQL's full-text ranking capabilities are quite limited and AFAIK full-text wasn't a priority for them lately. The related article is "Rankings with InnoDB Full-Text Search" [1] If it works for you - great. If you need more flexibility in terms of data tokenization, matching and ranking you can consider Manticore Search [1] instead of Elasticsearch since it's a continuation (a fork made in 2017) of the Sphinx search engine mentioned in the article on mysql.com and has a better integration with MySQL than Elasticsearch (e.g. you can use Linux mysql client or any programming language mysql connector to make queries to Manticore). [1] https://dev.mysql.com/blog-archive/rankings-with-innodb-full... [2] https://github.com/manticoresoftware/manticoresearch
In Ask HN: Isn't MySQL full-text search better than Elasticsearch?
I don't see anywhere where they claim that it's faster simply because it's written in C++. They do mention that they make use of C++ to add low level optimizations that make queries faster and the memory imprint smaller, but any claims about performance in the readme are linked to benchmarks to back up their claims https://github.com/manticoresoftware/manticoresearch/ https://db-benchmarks.com/test-taxi/#manticore-search-vs-ela...
In Manticore 6.0.0 – a faster alternative to Elasticsearch in C++
Read the rest
onic Algolia https://github.com/marconi1992/algolite https://quickwit.io/ https://github.com/quickwit-inc/quickwit https://docs.meilisearch.com/ https://github.com/prabhatsharma/zinc phalanx https://github.com/blugelabs/bluge https://github.com/mosuka/phalanx https://github.com/mosuka/blast ManticoreSearch https://github.com/manticoresoftware/manticoresearch https://github.com/manticoresoftware/docker https://manticoresearch.com/blog/manticore-alternative-to-el... https://manticoresearch.com/ https://manual.manticoresearch.com/Introduction https://forum.manticoresearch.com/t/manticore-search-cheatsh... https://forum.manticoresearch.com/ Whoosh https://whoosh.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ https://pypi.org/project/Whoosh/ lyra https://github.com/nearform/lyra https://nearform.github.io/lyra/ https://github.com/LyraSearch/lyra https://lyrasearch.io/ flexsearch https://github.com/nextapps-de/flexsearch#performance-benchm... https://pagefind.app/docs/ Lucene https://github.com/apache/lucene https://lucene.apache.org/ ZincSearch https://zincsearch.com/ Solr https://solr.apache.org/ https://solr.apache.org/operator/ https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/getting-started/so... https://github.com/apache/solr https://solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/deployment-guide/s... Konnu https://gitlab.com/shadowislord/konnu Quickwit QuickWit + Clickhouse https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/guides/developer/full-text-se... https://clickhouse.com/docs/en/sql-reference/functions/strin... There is no way I can get to running all of these (this project was supposed to be quick!!), but I will run the ones I noted earlier, and probably manticore too since it was high on my list since it's quite polished looking.
In Sonic: Fast, lightweight and schema-less search backend
> It's interesting to note that Elasticsearch and Opensearch are general purpose search engine, Solr as well. They are all powered by Lucene, the popular and performant search engine library. Another search engine which can be considered general, is not based on Lucene and is not less powerful than Elasticsearch/Solr is Manticore Search [1] [1]: https://github.com/manticoresoftware/manticoresearch > I would love to see some benchmarks by category :) I'd love too. We started this work on db-benchmarks [2] , hopefully we'll have resources to continue it. Contributions are very welcome. It's 100% opensource [3] [2]: https://db-benchmarks.com/ [3]: https://github.com/db-benchmarks/db-benchmarks
In ZincSearch – lightweight alternative to Elasticsearch written in Go
(disclaimer: I'm one of the cofounder of Quickwit.io, we are doing log search) (edited to add vector search category and add manticore) When looking at OSS search projects, it's nice to have a rough ideas of the different use cases, here is the list I have in mind: - user facing search (think algolia): elasticsearch[1]/opensearch[2], meilisearch[3], typesense[4] - enterprise search: elasticsearch/opensearch - log search: elasticsearch/opensearch, loki[5], quickwit[6], zincsearch[7] - vector search: Milvus[8], Qdrant[9], Vald[10] Weaviate[11] Vespa.ai[12] is great but I don't really know in which category to put them, user facing and enterprise search seems to work well with them. It's interesting to note that Elasticsearch and Opensearch are general purpose search engine, Solr as well. They are all powered by Lucene, the popular and per
Read the rest
In ZincSearch – lightweight alternative to Elasticsearch written in Go

Showing the 15 most recent of 18 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.