HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
marak
faker.js
HISTORICAL RECORD2010–2022
marak / faker.js · Not publicly available

faker.js

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

39Distinct people
44Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year44 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2010-05-16 08:16:40 UTC to 2022-01-17 01:53:56 UTC.

0369122010-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments20102011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 2 submissions, 0 comments2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20162017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 4 submissions, 3 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 11 mentions; 1 submissions, 10 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 12 mentions; 5 submissions, 7 comments2022

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20102010-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20112011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20122012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC220
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC312
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC743
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC11110
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC1257

What Hacker News says

44 sources
Amazing you wrote this entire comment without taking a second confirm the premise you're so passionately defending... No one took away his ownership. Marak: https://github.com/marak/Faker.js/ https://www.npmjs.com/package/faker Post: https://github.com/faker-js/faker https://www.npmjs.com/package/@faker-js/faker Faker.js is not a trademarked term, so someone made a new Faker.js. In fact multiple people did, and one emerged as the preferred fork: https://twitter.com/faker_js/status/1481918305669627905 - And to be clear, even if NPM goes and replaces his package with this new fork, it wouldn't take away his ownership. Github could do the same... doesn't take away his ownership. His ownership of a Github page is not his ownership of the code. I don't like this rules-lawyering stuff either, yet this is one time where even if you decide to be
Read the rest
purposely inflexible with your understanding of laws/licensing/contracts etc... there's still no issue with how this has been handled.
In Faker.js is now a community controlled project
> It was a malicious act to the users of his project, sure. But how was it a malicious act to GitHub? You can't use GitHub to perform malicious acts, even if the victim isn't GitHub. GitHub isn't obligated to support anyone's malicious acts with their platform. > If DHH decided that Rails was contributing more harm to the world then good, and tried to remove it from GitHub, would GitHub lock his account and restore his repos "on behalf of the community", to side with the smooth operation of the open source ecosystem over a user's personal decisions? To what extent has GitHub decided that they "know best" for the open source community? GitHub hasn't done any of these things with faker.js. Marak deleted the code and replaced it with a non-functional repo that has a README.md that just says "What really happened with Aaron Swartz?" (Referenc
Read the rest
e to a conspiracy theory) It's still here. You can still see it: https://github.com/Marak/faker.js
In Faker.js is now a community controlled project
Faker was a package to generate fake data. For example you could do "faker.internet.email()" and it would generate some email address to use. From the package's original description > faker.js - generate massive amounts of fake data in the browser and node.js http://web.archive.org/web/20211208113955/https://www.npmjs.... It appears the git history has been overwritten entirely. https://github.com/Marak/faker.js/commits/master
In NPM package FakerJS with millions of weekly downloads hacked
I wanted to improve my JavaScript programming, and learn AG Grid at the same time so I tried to think of an application which had a data grid front and center, but met needs that I had. So I built a Markdown table code generator. I've always hated building tables for Markdown so this was helpful in intial prototype stage. I added CSV because AG Grid has an exportDataAsCSV function so it was a 'no cost' feature. The parsing code for importing the various formats is pretty minimal so there will be many edge cases that don't work. Because everything is based around the same data structures internally adding new import and export formats was fairly simple. I haven't added any tests yet because I was incrementally building it and learning to structure JavaScript at the same time. It is pure JavaScript with no frameworks, simply because I'm con
Read the rest
centrating on learning JavaScript at the moment and there is no build system. Looking at the code now, after a 4 month gap I can see that I didn't even know about JavaScript modules and imports at the time I started so the code is just added directly into the main index through a script element include. It isn't the most robust application but it was an interesting starting point. My end goal with it was to add data generation capabilities, and have it all run in the browser, but I haven't got to that point yet. My plan is to try to do this by adding a 'type' to each column and then using Faker to generate the data https://github.com/marak/Faker.js/ Thought it might be useful if anyone is learning JavaScript and wants to see a simple application. Code is here: https://github.com/eviltester/grid-table-editor The readme file in the source has links to other similar apps which have been around for much longer if anyone needs an inbrowser table editor.
In Show HN: A grid based editor for Markdown tables, CSV, Gherkin tables, HTML
Hey Marak, have you compensated the original author of faker yet or are you too busy being much of a drama queen (ref GH bug #1046)? How about that relicencing removing the copyleft and attribution terms? Copyright 2004-2005 Jason Kohles, GPL-1/Artistic --- https://metacpan.org/source/JASONK/Data-Faker-0.07/lib/Data/... Copyright 2010 Marak Squires, MIT --- https://github.com/Marak/faker.js/blob/a9f98046c7d5eeaabe12f... Looks too me like you are really butt-hurt about other people ripping you off, but have no problem doing the same yourself. /cc ddevault
In Monetizing open-source is problematic
> CDN is hardcoded into the JS library. Why would you even do that and then shame people? It’s worth noting that before the fakercloud.com URLs were hard-coded into the library, the library was hard-coding a different service’s S3 URLs (uifaces.co) and only stopped when they became inaccessible: https://github.com/Marak/faker.js/commit/e45648439ff5dd9adbe... https://github.com/Marak/faker.js/issues/1055 So it seems a little unfair to complain that Retool are embedding URLs to your CDN when this library was doing the same thing to UI Faces a few months ago.
In Monetizing open-source is problematic

Showing the 15 most recent of 44 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.