HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
MarioRicalde
SCSS.tmbundle
OPEN SOURCE2011–2011
MarioRicalde / SCSS.tmbundle

SCSS.tmbundle

The TextMate SCSS Official Bundle. Now Compatible with SublimeText2.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
827GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

The TextMate SCSS Official Bundle. Now Compatible with SublimeText2.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by 6-hour interval2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2011-03-28 05:00:44 UTC to 2011-04-03 00:09:40 UTC.

012011-03-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-03-28 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 28, 00:002011-03-28 06:00:00 UTC to 2011-03-28 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-03-28 12:00:00 UTC to 2011-03-28 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-03-28 18:00:00 UTC to 2011-03-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-03-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-03-29 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-03-29 06:00:00 UTC to 2011-03-29 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-03-29 12:00:00 UTC to 2011-03-29 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-03-29 18:00:00 UTC to 2011-03-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-03-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-03-30 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-03-30 06:00:00 UTC to 2011-03-30 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-03-30 12:00:00 UTC to 2011-03-30 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-03-30 18:00:00 UTC to 2011-03-31 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-03-31 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-03-31 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMar 31, 00:002011-03-31 06:00:00 UTC to 2011-03-31 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-03-31 12:00:00 UTC to 2011-03-31 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-03-31 18:00:00 UTC to 2011-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-04-01 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-04-01 06:00:00 UTC to 2011-04-01 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-04-01 12:00:00 UTC to 2011-04-01 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-04-01 18:00:00 UTC to 2011-04-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-04-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-04-02 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-04-02 06:00:00 UTC to 2011-04-02 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-04-02 12:00:00 UTC to 2011-04-02 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-04-02 18:00:00 UTC to 2011-04-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2011-04-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-04-03 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsApr 3, 00:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Mar 28, 00:002011-03-28 00:00:00 UTC2011-03-28 06:00:00 UTC101
Mar 28, 06:002011-03-28 06:00:00 UTC2011-03-28 12:00:00 UTC000
Mar 28, 12:002011-03-28 12:00:00 UTC2011-03-28 18:00:00 UTC000
Mar 28, 18:002011-03-28 18:00:00 UTC2011-03-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 29, 00:002011-03-29 00:00:00 UTC2011-03-29 06:00:00 UTC000
Mar 29, 06:002011-03-29 06:00:00 UTC2011-03-29 12:00:00 UTC000
Mar 29, 12:002011-03-29 12:00:00 UTC2011-03-29 18:00:00 UTC000
Mar 29, 18:002011-03-29 18:00:00 UTC2011-03-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 30, 00:002011-03-30 00:00:00 UTC2011-03-30 06:00:00 UTC000
Mar 30, 06:002011-03-30 06:00:00 UTC2011-03-30 12:00:00 UTC000
Mar 30, 12:002011-03-30 12:00:00 UTC2011-03-30 18:00:00 UTC000
Mar 30, 18:002011-03-30 18:00:00 UTC2011-03-31 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 31, 00:002011-03-31 00:00:00 UTC2011-03-31 06:00:00 UTC000
Mar 31, 06:002011-03-31 06:00:00 UTC2011-03-31 12:00:00 UTC000
Mar 31, 12:002011-03-31 12:00:00 UTC2011-03-31 18:00:00 UTC000
Mar 31, 18:002011-03-31 18:00:00 UTC2011-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 1, 00:002011-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2011-04-01 06:00:00 UTC000
Apr 1, 06:002011-04-01 06:00:00 UTC2011-04-01 12:00:00 UTC000
Apr 1, 12:002011-04-01 12:00:00 UTC2011-04-01 18:00:00 UTC000
Apr 1, 18:002011-04-01 18:00:00 UTC2011-04-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 2, 00:002011-04-02 00:00:00 UTC2011-04-02 06:00:00 UTC000
Apr 2, 06:002011-04-02 06:00:00 UTC2011-04-02 12:00:00 UTC000
Apr 2, 12:002011-04-02 12:00:00 UTC2011-04-02 18:00:00 UTC000
Apr 2, 18:002011-04-02 18:00:00 UTC2011-04-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 3, 00:002011-04-03 00:00:00 UTC2011-04-03 06:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
Install the following: https://github.com/protocool/AckMate - Searching within your project sucks by default. This makes it not suck. Testing - https://github.com/aslakhellesoy/cucumber-tmbundle - Bundle for cucumber highlighting. https://github.com/rspec/rspec-tmbundle - Lets you run specs individually from within textmate. Frontend - https://github.com/kuroir/SCSS.tmbundle & https://github.com/peterlih/handcrafted-haml-textmate-bundle & https://github.com/seaofclouds/sass-textmate-bundle - Sass/Haml/Scss bundles. HAML and Sass will make you life significantly easier, embrace them. Next up, download and install : http://www.levien.com/type/myfonts/inconsolata.html For themes, I prefer 'Blackboard' with the font changed to Inconsolata, but play around with the various color schemes and choose whichever you prefer. You'll probably spen
Read the rest
d a lot of time looking at it. Now, bookmark: http://api.rubyonrails.org/ and pretty much keep it open somewhere all the time. It's invaluable for rooting through why things aren't working. Lastly, rails is full of magic. Magic that sometimes is quite far removed from the actual errors you run into. Your first few months will probably have more than a few very frustrating moments where things just don't work and you can't figure out why. Stackoverflow is your friend, and no question is stupid. If you can't google an answer, just ask.
In Ask HN: Textmate and RoR?
Like many of the other commenters, I break the code into reset, global elements, layout, modules/blocks, and then special overrides if any. I'll admit it's a personal preference, but as a team consideration I don't recommend the 'all properties on one line' approach. It's discouraged in other languages so why do it in CSS? Definitely check out OOCSS as well as the Natalie Downe talk both posted by in the comments already. I can't overstate how highly I recommend Sass/SCSS. It's been mentioned already as "for Ruby". Yes, you need Ruby installed to use Sass/SCSS but you do not need to be working on a Ruby project to use it. You can run "sass --watch (directory name)" from the command line and sass will automatically compile your .scss (or .sass) files to .css files upon save. Even if you're scared of the command line I assure you, it's easy
Read the rest
! If you're a TextMate user, there's also a great SCSS bundle here: https://github.com/kuroir/SCSS.tmbundle (it was enough for me to abandon CSSEdit for good) One thing that hasn't been discussed in this thread yet is the organization of properties within a declaration block. It's a good idea to have an approach and stick with it. Alphabetizing the properties is one approach. I wrote about my preferred approach a couple years ago here: http://fordinteractive.com/2009/02/order-of-the-day-css-prop... (also check out the SitePoint discussion linked in the "Further Reading" section of the post)
In Ask HN: Anyone have a really smart way to organize css?

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.