HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
marmelab
admin-on-rest
JavaScript2016–2018
marmelab / admin-on-rest · Archived

admin-on-rest

A frontend framework for building admin SPAs on top of REST services, using React and Material Design.

4Distinct people
5Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
398GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A frontend framework for building admin SPAs on top of REST services, using React and Material Design.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month5 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-10-27 10:37:57 UTC to 2018-03-03 15:43:55 UTC.

0122016-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsOct 20162016-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2017-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJun 20172017-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2017-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 commentsMar 2018

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Oct 20162016-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-11-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Nov 20162016-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-12-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 20162016-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-02-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 20172017-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-03-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 20172017-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 20172017-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-05-01 00:00:00 UTC000
May 20172017-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-06-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Jun 20172017-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-07-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 20172017-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 20172017-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-09-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Sep 20172017-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 20172017-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-11-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 20172017-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 20172017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 20182018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 20182018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

5 sources
Yes static YAML for config. It may be more verbose but it's simpler than Rail's ERB in YAML that requires a the Ruby VM plus application config to interpret. Yes external libraries. 80% of those are for testing (as is the Python stuff). In Go land you should effectively ignore the vendor folder, I check it in for developer convenience and system stability. Compare to Rails which has a massive dependency graph. And one that has to follow your app around for every build and deploy. I will absolutely grant that for SQL CRUD apps, you still can't beat the Rails tooling. Migrations, rake tasks, ActiveRecord, Scaffolding and the Ruby REPL to poke at your models and data are very useful. But decoupled tooling is getting really good. The https://github.com/marmelab/admin-on-rest project is better than Django Admin. The basic CRUD stuff is just as
Read the rest
easy, then it's infinitely more configurable with a bit of custom React programming. And it's not coupled to any language, framework or database. Finally cost is effectively zero for all of these options to start. AWS and Heroku offer a generous free tier. Developer time is the real cost to watch. But in terms of raw resource consumption, static Go binaries talking to DynamoDB plus a static React page are obviously less "expensive" than Ruby VMs talking to a dedicated Postgres server and rendering HTML pages.
In Ask HN: What stack would you use to build a CRUD web app in 2018?
Golang for the API, running on Lambda. React or Vue for the UI. FaaS isn’t a fad, new systems built on an event based architecture are simpler, more cost effective, and scalable than the traditional application server approach. And the reactive programming pattern is easy and powerful and maps extremely well to modern UI needs. I have a boilerplate Go / Lambda app here: https://github.com/nzoschke/gofaas I use it with this excellent admin interface framework for CRUD tools: https://github.com/marmelab/admin-on-rest
In Ask HN: What stack would you use to build a CRUD web app in 2018?
swah·Aug 3, 2017Submission

Ask HN: Write admin in Golang or just deploy two languages/frameworks?

Hi guys, I am in a state of analysis paralysis. After doing a nice part of this realtime Golang API (Postgresql backed, say 1k lines) I want to write an admin page and I'm finding it a big hassle in Go, even with https://github.com/marmelab/admin-on-rest - and I only have 5 tables or so. I have to write a lot of repetitive code for each HTTP operation and for each table... I also have to duplicate my "models" (structs) since the keys I want to JSON encode aren't the same as in the "main application" (cf Golang type tags). Should I just suck it up and write the code, or throw Django together, redefine the models there and present that as the admin (operating on the same database as the main app) ?
3 points · Open discussion
Admin-on-rest: Admin GUI for REST APIS, using react + redux + react-router + saga + material ui https://github.com/marmelab/admin-on-rest Contains documentation and unit tests, plus a few neat react tricks (like a custom React-router Route component and an accumulator saga), documented there: * http://marmelab.com/blog/2016/09/20/custom-react-router-comp... * http://marmelab.com/blog/2016/10/18/using-redux-saga-to-dedu...
In Ask HN: What good open source projects written in React that I can learn from?

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.