HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
marssaxman
fleet
C2015–2019
marssaxman / fleet

fleet

exokernel style operating system based on lightweight virtual machines

3Distinct people
5Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
25GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

exokernel style operating system based on lightweight virtual machines

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year5 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-10-19 10:10:45 UTC to 2019-03-26 19:59:10 UTC.

01232015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2019

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC312
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

5 sources
This architecture sounds like one I would want to use for all of my personal computing devices. I believe this because I did a bunch of experimental hacking three years ago with the objective of designing an operating system with usability and security characteristics that would suit me better than Linux or Android currently do. I didn't make a huge amount of progress toward a working system (you can see what I did here: https://github.com/marssaxman/fleet), but I spent a lot of time reading and thinking as I tinkered. The people working on Fuchsia have clearly thought deeply in similar directions, gone a lot further in the work, and resolved a lot of the uncertainties I encountered. I won't let Google manage my data for me, but if they can keep their fingers out of the pie I would gladly use a Fuchsia-based system as described here for m
Read the rest
y laptop, phone, and home desktop.
In Fuchsia OS Introduction
Yes! This is an argument I've been making for several years now: the user-centric security model is obsolete and unhelpful, because most computers have either one or zero users in the traditional sense. The whole unix-style reduced-privileges-plus-sudo approach that Windows and MacOS have copied is a nuisance which doesn't really solve the problem; the permissions systems in Android and iOS are a little closer to the mark. Qubes is a good step forward. The real problem is exactly what you said: we can't fully trust software, even software which is not explicitly malicious, because software can be exploited, and because software authors sometimes want to be "helpful" in ways we'd really rather they weren't. Every piece of software should run within a sandbox, and the human user should have complete control over which resources are or are n
Read the rest
ot exposed to each sandbox; that's the future operating system I want to see. I did some exploration around the idea of doing this with hypervisors and unikernels (http://www.github.com/marssaxman/fleet) but it got to look too much like rewriting all the software in the world. Containers are less elegant, but seem to be a more practical way of moving in the right direction.
In The End of the General Purpose Operating System
There's a lot of activity going on in this space right now, which is great. I was working on my own project very similar to this one, which I called 'fleet': http://www.github.com/marssaxman/fleet/ I've recently decided to stop working on this and to start contributing to IncludeOS instead, since they have a lot of energy and good ideas, and they're getting farther than I was on my own: http://www.github.com/hioa-cs/IncludeOS/ One great thing about unikernels is that fragmentation is not really a problem: it's a good thing to have a healthy, diverse ecosystem of unikernel libraries adapted for different purposes.
In The Solo5 Unikernel

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.