HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
MatthewZMD
aidermacs
Emacs Lisp2025–2025
MatthewZMD / aidermacs

aidermacs

AI Pair Programming in Emacs with Aider

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
934GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

AI Pair Programming in Emacs with Aider

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2025-05-07 17:53:16 UTC to 2025-05-08 17:12:56 UTC.

012025-05-07 17:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-07 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMay 7, 17:002025-05-07 18:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-07 19:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-07 19:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-07 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-07 20:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-07 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-07 21:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-07 22:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-07 22:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-07 23:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-07 23:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-08 01:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-08 01:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-08 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-08 02:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-08 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-08 03:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-08 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-08 04:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-08 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-08 05:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-08 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMay 8, 05:002025-05-08 06:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-08 07:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-08 07:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-08 08:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-08 08:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-08 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-08 09:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-08 10:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-08 10:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-08 11:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-08 11:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-08 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-08 12:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-08 13:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-08 13:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-08 14:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-08 14:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-08 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-08 15:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-08 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-08 16:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-08 17:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-05-08 17:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-08 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMay 8, 17:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
May 7, 17:002025-05-07 17:00:00 UTC2025-05-07 18:00:00 UTC101
May 7, 18:002025-05-07 18:00:00 UTC2025-05-07 19:00:00 UTC000
May 7, 19:002025-05-07 19:00:00 UTC2025-05-07 20:00:00 UTC000
May 7, 20:002025-05-07 20:00:00 UTC2025-05-07 21:00:00 UTC000
May 7, 21:002025-05-07 21:00:00 UTC2025-05-07 22:00:00 UTC000
May 7, 22:002025-05-07 22:00:00 UTC2025-05-07 23:00:00 UTC000
May 7, 23:002025-05-07 23:00:00 UTC2025-05-08 00:00:00 UTC000
May 8, 00:002025-05-08 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-08 01:00:00 UTC000
May 8, 01:002025-05-08 01:00:00 UTC2025-05-08 02:00:00 UTC000
May 8, 02:002025-05-08 02:00:00 UTC2025-05-08 03:00:00 UTC000
May 8, 03:002025-05-08 03:00:00 UTC2025-05-08 04:00:00 UTC000
May 8, 04:002025-05-08 04:00:00 UTC2025-05-08 05:00:00 UTC000
May 8, 05:002025-05-08 05:00:00 UTC2025-05-08 06:00:00 UTC000
May 8, 06:002025-05-08 06:00:00 UTC2025-05-08 07:00:00 UTC000
May 8, 07:002025-05-08 07:00:00 UTC2025-05-08 08:00:00 UTC000
May 8, 08:002025-05-08 08:00:00 UTC2025-05-08 09:00:00 UTC000
May 8, 09:002025-05-08 09:00:00 UTC2025-05-08 10:00:00 UTC000
May 8, 10:002025-05-08 10:00:00 UTC2025-05-08 11:00:00 UTC000
May 8, 11:002025-05-08 11:00:00 UTC2025-05-08 12:00:00 UTC000
May 8, 12:002025-05-08 12:00:00 UTC2025-05-08 13:00:00 UTC000
May 8, 13:002025-05-08 13:00:00 UTC2025-05-08 14:00:00 UTC000
May 8, 14:002025-05-08 14:00:00 UTC2025-05-08 15:00:00 UTC000
May 8, 15:002025-05-08 15:00:00 UTC2025-05-08 16:00:00 UTC000
May 8, 16:002025-05-08 16:00:00 UTC2025-05-08 17:00:00 UTC000
May 8, 17:002025-05-08 17:00:00 UTC2025-05-08 18:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
> That's not working in any IDE is it? The crux of the matter is the level of integration, with Cursor (and others) I can apply the suggestions via autocomplete and see git diffs with agent code. Would a simple VSCode plugin for Aider not be able to do that? I haven't tried it out, but Aidermacs (https://github.com/MatthewZMD/aidermacs) is an Emacs plugin that supposedly mimics some of Cursor's feature - but by using Aider. I'm not saying Cursor is bad or anything. It may well be as good as Aider or a bit better. But it's not vastly better. If you had $1M to spare, would you risk investing in Cursor? Especially knowing that open source solutions are as good or at worst not far behind? In the long run, some open source solution (Aider or something else) is going to eat Cursor's lunch. BTW, I too initially wanted something that worked in my
Read the rest
IDE. Then I just gave Aider a try and realized I prefer it being an external tool.
In Cursor hits $9B valuation

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.