HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
meta
facebook-ios-sdk
Swift2010–2024
meta / facebook-ios-sdk

facebook-ios-sdk

Used to integrate the Facebook Platform with your iOS & tvOS apps.

24Distinct people
31Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
8.1KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Used to integrate the Facebook Platform with your iOS & tvOS apps.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year31 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2010-08-12 22:06:25 UTC to 2024-08-18 20:03:00 UTC.

05101520252010-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments20102011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 25 mentions; 4 submissions, 21 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2024

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20102010-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20112011-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20122012-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC25421
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

31 sources
Problems listed in the article: > Everyone uses different operating systems, IDEs and dev tools. How is this related to .gitignore? > This list will only keep growing, it will never end Where's the problem? A random Facebook's repo has its gitignore file weigh 2KB[0]. Is this a problem? > Is the “.gitignore” file competing with the “README.md” for the most updated file in the git repo? I hope not Again, why is this a bad thing? The author just wanted to rant about something but didn't know about what *[0] https://github.com/facebook/facebook-ios-sdk/blob/main/.giti...
In Stop Using Git Ignore
I had missed some information on my network monitoring app (RethinkDNS[1]) and updated my last comment before seeing your reply! You're right about the connections to a Facebook server, though I'm only seeing the connections when the app is cold-started on Android. I haven't had the chance to test on iOS. The Facebook Android[2] and iOS[3] SDKs are source-available. From a privacy perspective, when someone compares Google Maps to HERE WeGo, the question is whether using Google or HERE (plus the Facebook SDK) would be more of a privacy violation. I don't have a good answer to this question. But from a market share perspective, HERE WeGo is a minor player compared to Google and using it instead of Google Maps would help curb Google's market dominance in mapping. Of course, if a free and open source OSM-based app is viable for your area, I w
Read the rest
In Google sends anti-regulation propaganda to small businesses using Google Maps
Just disconnect your phone from the internet. Native apps aren't much better. The real solution is to use FOSS apps that you can check yourself and trust regardless of pwa or native. Your browser and device already had APIs to track you long before PWA standard and they still do. https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2020/06/tiktok-and-53-other-... https://www.theverge.com/2020/7/25/21338151/instagram-bug-ca... https://github.com/facebook/facebook-ios-sdk/issues/1374 https://github.com/facebook/facebook-ios-sdk/issues/1427
In W3C give up on preventing PWAs from tracking users
Question. In https://github.com/facebook/facebook-ios-sdk/issues/1373#iss..., it's noted that FBSDK starts the in the `+load` method. I understand that's what's causing the crashes. In https://github.com/facebook/facebook-ios-sdk/issues/1427#iss..., someone mentions that <key>FacebookAutoInitEnabled</key> <false/> disables auto init. Couldn't this potentially eliminate all FBSDK-related startup/non-interactively-caused crashes?
In Can Facebook provide postmortems on their iOS SDK crashes?
The backtrace in https://github.com/facebook/facebook-ios-sdk/issues/1374 makes it sound like they passed a nil pointer to NSOrderedSet's initWithSet method, from inside FBSDKServerConfigurationManager's processLoadRequestResponse method. That makes it sound like a new version of the data provided by the server didn't have some field that old versions of the SDK expected, and the old code didn't catch that exception.
In Can Facebook provide postmortems on their iOS SDK crashes?
Workaround for users: Enable airplane mode and disable WiFi, or block facebook domains Workaround for developers: Go to Facebook Developer page > Analytics and disable automatic Events.[0] Apparently this doesn't solve the issue for everyone. Issue in Facebook's tracker: https://developers.facebook.com/status/issues/17391881029111... [0] https://github.com/facebook/facebook-ios-sdk/issues/1427#iss...
In App suddenly crashing on startup due to FBSDKRestrictiveDataFilterManager.m

Showing the 15 most recent of 31 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.