machnet

It feels like you're not really trying, if you can't cite anything in genre with what you are talking about? I'd love to run off Google Falcon versus say Microsoft's Machnet. There's a ton of system resources dedicated to making machnet and dpdk fast, it comes with huge design tradeoffs & specially carefully crafted software architectures. Extreme software engineering effort. The glory of Falcon is that you don't need to rebuild your app stack from the bottom up like this: you're just going to get blitz fast insane utilization with incredibly low p99 for free from the system you have. https://github.com/microsoft/machnet I think you massively over-glorify the software side of things. There is a ton of potential absolutely to very carefully setup systems to get great goodput, no degredation. But it usually requires carefully built systems

Hi all! We've built Machnet to provide an easy way for applications to reduce their datacenter networking latency via kernel-bypass (DPDK-based) messaging. Distributed applications like databases and finance can use Machnet as the networking library to get sub-100 microsecond tail network latency at high message rates, e.g., 750,000 1KB request-reply messages per second on Azure F8s_v2 VMs with 61 microsecond P99.9 round-trip latency. Machnet supports a variety of cloud (Azure, AWS, GCP) and bare-metal platforms, OSs and NICs, evaluated in https://github.com/microsoft/machnet/blob/main/docs/PERFORMA.... While there are several other DPDK-based network stacks, Machnet provides the following unique benefits: (1) Specifically designed for and tested on public cloud VM environments. (2) Multiple applications on the same machine can use Machne