HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
microsoft
TypeScript-Compiler-Notes
JavaScript2022–2022
microsoft / TypeScript-Compiler-Notes

TypeScript-Compiler-Notes

A repo containing notes about the TypeScript Compiler codebase

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
701GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A repo containing notes about the TypeScript Compiler codebase

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 12:54:37 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2022-04-03 19:42:32 UTC to 2022-07-30 02:06:42 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012022-03-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 282022-04-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-04-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-04-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-09 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMay 232022-05-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-06-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-06-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-07-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-07-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-07-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-07-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-07-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-07-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-07-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-07-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 25

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Mar 282022-03-28 00:00:00 UTC2022-04-04 00:00:00 UTC101
Apr 42022-04-04 00:00:00 UTC2022-04-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 112022-04-11 00:00:00 UTC2022-04-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 182022-04-18 00:00:00 UTC2022-04-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 252022-04-25 00:00:00 UTC2022-05-02 00:00:00 UTC000
May 22022-05-02 00:00:00 UTC2022-05-09 00:00:00 UTC000
May 92022-05-09 00:00:00 UTC2022-05-16 00:00:00 UTC000
May 162022-05-16 00:00:00 UTC2022-05-23 00:00:00 UTC000
May 232022-05-23 00:00:00 UTC2022-05-30 00:00:00 UTC000
May 302022-05-30 00:00:00 UTC2022-06-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 62022-06-06 00:00:00 UTC2022-06-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 132022-06-13 00:00:00 UTC2022-06-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 202022-06-20 00:00:00 UTC2022-06-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 272022-06-27 00:00:00 UTC2022-07-04 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 42022-07-04 00:00:00 UTC2022-07-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 112022-07-11 00:00:00 UTC2022-07-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 182022-07-18 00:00:00 UTC2022-07-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 252022-07-25 00:00:00 UTC2022-08-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
This is /extremely/ uncharitable. It depends more on the project. For example, both Go and .NET are very well written engineering achievements with thorough documentation. Many, many other deeply influential projects have also been absorbed by the Apache Foundation or other FOSS initiatives. Furthermore, every software megacorp has boat loads of teams working on hundreds even thousands (!) of different open source projects. The quality naturally varies. Let me pick two more esoteric projects as a point of comparison. Yandex Odyssey [0] an advanced multi-threaded PostgreSQL connection pooler and request router. Figuring out how exactly and when to use this is not quite clear. There is no "getting started" guide for this package. There is barely any explanation for how it works or what it does. pg_auto_failover [1] run by Citus (owned by Mi
Read the rest
crosoft) monitors and manages automated failover for a Postgres cluster. This repo even has diagrams explaining the workflow and complete instructions. Frankly, it's unreal just how much code is open nowadays especially from the giants. Visual Studio, for example, had been under lockdown for 20 years. Now Visual Studio Code is being developed in the open and has extremely thorough documentation that walks developers through the entire build process in painstaking detail.[2] This is a blazing fast editor written in JavaScript of all things! Or consider TypeScript, an incredible engineering feat. There is an entire repo dedicated to engineering notes on how the compiler works with links to interesting feature contributions and a video! [3] I'm only picking Microsoft here as the primary example since you dumped on them the hardest. *No other industry does this. It is absolutely wild how much copyleft influenced software culture.* [0]: https://github.com/yandex/odyssey [1]: https://github.com/citusdata/pg_auto_failover [2]: https://github.com/microsoft/vscode/wiki/How-to-Contribute [3]: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript-Compiler-Notes/
In C++ Asynchronous Framework

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.