HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
microsoft
TypeScript-React-Starter
TypeScript2017–2018
microsoft / TypeScript-React-Starter · Archived

TypeScript-React-Starter

A starter template for TypeScript and React with a detailed README describing how to use the two together.

12Distinct people
12Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
11KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A starter template for TypeScript and React with a detailed README describing how to use the two together.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 11:56:56 AM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month12 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2017-05-11 19:11:07 UTC to 2018-09-27 18:14:12 UTC.

02462017-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 3 submissions, 3 commentsMay 20172017-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2017-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJan 20182018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2018-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2018-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2018-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 commentsSep 2018

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
May 20172017-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-06-01 00:00:00 UTC633
Jun 20172017-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-07-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Jul 20172017-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 20172017-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 20172017-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 20172017-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-11-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 20172017-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 20172017-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 20182018-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 20182018-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 20182018-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-05-01 00:00:00 UTC000
May 20182018-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20182018-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-07-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Jul 20182018-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-08-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Aug 20182018-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-09-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Sep 20182018-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-10-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

12 sources
> And TypeScript uses the ECMAScript module system. Erm, I was thinking of a discussion like the one over here: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript-React-Starter/issues... Q: `import React from "react";` breaks in Typescript A: have you tried `import * as React from 'react';` Me: Golly! > Decorators are a JavaScript (TC39 stage 2) proposal, and TypeScript only uses them if you use --experimentalDecorators. Oh, didn’t know about the flag; I thought it's already a standard language feature now, what with all the Angular apps relying on it. As for decorators being a TC39 proposal, I am aware of that, but they have remained a proposal for quite a long time now, haven’t they (about 4 years now?), and I remember babel renaming the transformer for decorators to legacy-decorators-something, saying that the very semantics of decorators in JS
Read the rest
is still debatable (some thought of them simply in terms of functions accepting a function and returning another function; some in more angular sense of injecting some properties into methods). I hope I am not completely misrepresenting the rationale here.
In Fusion.js: A Plugin-Based Universal Web Framework
> What would you recommend to someone averse to js I guess it depends on what your concerns are: • If you're worried about too many libraries to pick from, I'd just go with the most popular ones. React is a pretty solid choice. • If you're worried about config being a pain, I'd recommend going with one of the starter tools like Create React App. Build tools are indeed a bit complex, but hopefully that's getting better over time. • If you're scared by lack of type safety or worried about language quirks, I'd recommend TypeScript. (Flow is also quite good.) In particular, TypeScript (and Flow) provides much more flexible static typing than I've used in any other mainstream language. You get the nice navigation, autocomplete, and static checking that you'd expect from a typed language, and I've found that I spend much less time needing to th
Read the rest
ink about how to write my code in a way that appeases the type system. Here's a tutorial that hits all of the points above: https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript-React-Starter
In React Native: A retrospective from the mobile-engineering team at Udacity

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.