HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
minimaxir
hn-heatmaps
R2015–2015
minimaxir / hn-heatmaps

hn-heatmaps

Code and data necessary to reproduce heatmaps relating HN Submission time to submission score.

2Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
13GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Code and data necessary to reproduce heatmaps relating HN Submission time to submission score.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-07-10 14:54:22 UTC to 2015-10-27 19:50:41 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

0122015-07-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 commentsJul 62015-07-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-08-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-08-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-08-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-08-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-08-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-08-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-08-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-08-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-08-31 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-08-31 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsAug 312015-09-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-09-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-09-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-05 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-05 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-12 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-12 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-11-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsOct 26

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jul 62015-07-06 00:00:00 UTC2015-07-13 00:00:00 UTC211
Jul 132015-07-13 00:00:00 UTC2015-07-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 202015-07-20 00:00:00 UTC2015-07-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 272015-07-27 00:00:00 UTC2015-08-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 32015-08-03 00:00:00 UTC2015-08-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 102015-08-10 00:00:00 UTC2015-08-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 172015-08-17 00:00:00 UTC2015-08-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 242015-08-24 00:00:00 UTC2015-08-31 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 312015-08-31 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 72015-09-07 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-14 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 142015-09-14 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 212015-09-21 00:00:00 UTC2015-09-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 282015-09-28 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-05 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 52015-10-05 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-12 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 122015-10-12 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-19 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 192015-10-19 00:00:00 UTC2015-10-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 262015-10-26 00:00:00 UTC2015-11-02 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
Hi guys, Author of the medium post here. First I want to apologize to Max for not linking back to his blog, as he said I referenced his work and image multiple times and did not provide his name or blog in my post. I was in no way trying to pass this off as a novel idea as I said multiple times in the write up. As for what was perceived to be critiques of his work I was merely trying to emphasize what I was doing differently in my analysis and project. His project is great, I just used a slightly different approach and wanted to highlight the differences. I definitely did not mean to come off as malicious or mocking, but upon rereading I definitely see how it did come off that way. I stumbled across the code to make the day of week and times here https://github.com/minimaxir/hn-heatmaps/blob/master/hn_heat... after I had started the proje
Read the rest
ct. I had posted on StackOverflow http://stackoverflow.com/questions/33263015/converting-day-o... and had gotten an answer that seemed close but not quite perfect. So I researched it a bit, and happened to find that GitHub code. I figured that a couple of lines of code probably weren't worth attributing, but I can see now that I should have been more thorough in my attribution. I have since taken down the article.
In Please Do Not Steal My Code, Mock My Analysis, and Present My Ideas as Your Own
minimaxir·Jul 10, 2015Submission

Tell HN: If your HN submission doesn't get any upvotes, don't worry about it

I've recently been seeing many comments on Hacker News complaining that their submissions don't receive any points. As a result, they believe that vote manipulation techniques such as begging friends for votes on social media and using sockpuppet accounts to counteract this injustice are justifiable and that "everyone's doing it". While blatant voting manipulation may be the status quo at a certain other startup-oriented link aggregator, it is never good because it breaks the integrity of the service. However, the lack of upvotes is just how link aggregators work. The goal of many HN posters is to hit the front page. If you've received 10 points, you'll probably have hit the front page. However, depending on time of submission, you have a 10% to 20% chance of hitting 10 points: http://i.imgur.com/MdUvMB9.png That's low, even if your blog
Read the rest
post or startup is the Next Big Thing. However, what's the typical behavior for HN submissions? Here's a chart of the median points for HN submissions at each timeslot: http://i.imgur.com/SN5BuAJ.png The median is either 1 (no upvotes) or 2 (just 1 upvote), which reinforces how the typical behavior of HN really is. Yes, it's possible for submissions to slip through the cracks. HN allows resubmission of links if they haven't had any discussion (as long as you don't delete-then-resubmit to obfuscate the fact that it's a report). If your submission doesn't get points, submit again later. (Code and data for the two charts are available in this GitHub repository: https://github.com/minimaxir/hn-heatmaps)
99 points · Open discussion

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.