HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
MitchBradley
cforth
C2018–2026
MitchBradley / cforth

cforth

Mitch Bradley's CForth implementation

2Distinct people
19Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
171GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Mitch Bradley's CForth implementation

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 2:59:58 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year19 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-07-07 20:56:31 UTC to 2026-10-14 05:57:22 UTC.

012342018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

2 sources
Well it started out as a joke, but then I'm afraid it's starting to making sense. The blink attribute could be a control structure! Blinking text would only execute when you could see it, so you could write a blinking word "BEEP," and you'd hear it beeping on and off as it blinked! Or you could change a "DO" loop into a "DON'T" loop by making it transparent. And you could extend IF ELSE THEN to support a partially transparent MAYBE clause, whose probability of executing was proportional to its alpha channel. When looking at the FORTH code in Github that Mitch linked to, I realized that Github supports colored syntax highlighting for FORTH! (Or at least it tries.) https://github.com/MitchBradley/cforth/blob/master/src/cfort... But it colored the "Primitive control flow words" like if/do/while/etc red by mistake, because it didn't realize t
Read the rest
hat particular code was actually defining those words instead of just using them. It's pretty hard to write a code syntax colorizer for a language that does't actually have any syntax.
In Tali Forth 2 for the 6502
I got a quick reply from Mitch Bradley! Yes I wrote a paper but I probably can't find it. The easiest place to look would be in the Open Firmware source. https://github.com/MitchBradley/openfirmware/blob/master/for... The magic is all in +level and -level. Search for those in kernel.fth to see other places they are used to achieve a similar effect, e.g. in abort" For an alternative but effectively equivalent formulation, see: https://github.com/MitchBradley/cforth/blob/master/src/cfort... and https://github.com/MitchBradley/cforth/blob/master/src/cfort...
In Tali Forth 2 for the 6502

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.