HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
mitechie
Bookie
Python2012–2012
mitechie / Bookie

Bookie

Python based delicious.com replacement

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
5GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Python based delicious.com replacement

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2012-03-19 11:43:07 UTC to 2012-03-19 13:13:08 UTC.

012012-03-19 11:00:00 UTC to 2012-03-19 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 19, 11:002012-03-19 12:00:00 UTC to 2012-03-19 13:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMar 19, 12:002012-03-19 13:00:00 UTC to 2012-03-19 14:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 19, 13:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Mar 19, 11:002012-03-19 11:00:00 UTC2012-03-19 12:00:00 UTC101
Mar 19, 12:002012-03-19 12:00:00 UTC2012-03-19 13:00:00 UTC000
Mar 19, 13:002012-03-19 13:00:00 UTC2012-03-19 14:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
jarofgreen: I've thought a lot about this. I'm a big proponent of open source. And I intend to giving a lot of thought to open sourcing Nilai sometime in the future - just so that (as you put it) "techie people" can run their own servers if they want. However, I think running the service is where the value really is. If someone is techie enough to grab an open source project, install it on their own server, and keep it running - I have little doubt that they could build Nilai. In fact, they can probably build it better than I can. That being said, I do hope that Nilai will turn a profit. I'm charging such a small cost that I obviously do not intend to get rich off of Nilai but I wouldn't mind it running in the black rather than in the red. Perhaps you could give mittechie's Bookie a spin? https://github.com/mitechie/Bookie - I think it lo
Read the rest
oks pretty good.
In Why I'm building Nilai - A simple bookmarking service

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.