HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
mnfst
llm-gateway
TypeScript2024–2025
mnfst / llm-gateway

llm-gateway

Open Source LLM Gateway 🦚

6Distinct people
8Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
7.6KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Open Source LLM Gateway 🦚

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week8 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2024-12-11 16:20:32 UTC to 2025-03-22 11:40:47 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

0123452024-12-09 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-12-16 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsDec 92024-12-16 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-12-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-12-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-12-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-12-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsJan 272025-02-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-03-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-03-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-03-10 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025-03-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-03-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-03-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-03-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 commentsMar 17

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Dec 92024-12-09 00:00:00 UTC2024-12-16 00:00:00 UTC110
Dec 162024-12-16 00:00:00 UTC2024-12-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 232024-12-23 00:00:00 UTC2024-12-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 302024-12-30 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-06 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 62025-01-06 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-13 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 132025-01-13 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-20 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 202025-01-20 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 272025-01-27 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-03 00:00:00 UTC110
Feb 32025-02-03 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-10 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 102025-02-10 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 172025-02-17 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 242025-02-24 00:00:00 UTC2025-03-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 32025-03-03 00:00:00 UTC2025-03-10 00:00:00 UTC101
Mar 102025-03-10 00:00:00 UTC2025-03-17 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 172025-03-17 00:00:00 UTC2025-03-24 00:00:00 UTC514

What Hacker News says

8 sources
Whenever I look at a new project on github, the first thing I do is try to get to the "core" of the source code, where the actual code that implements the basic feature actually lives. One quality metric that I've noticed my brain has developed over the years is how deep in the directory hierarchy I have to dive to finally find some actual code amidst the mess of config files, readmes, yaml things, json metadata and various other crap that carry essentially no semantic. It's been surprising how accurately this metric measures the overall quality of the project. Large Java codebases are one of the worst offenders in that regard. Unfortunately by this metric, and independent of anything else, this project does not fare well at all ... I give you my first attempt at actually finding the code, depth= https://github.com/mnfst/manifest/blob/mas
Read the rest
ter/packages/core/... depth=6 below project top dir (ignoring github-added crap)
In Manifest: A 1-file micro-back end
Hey HN, Over the past few months, Manifest has sparked a lot of interest, and an engaged community has formed around it. Until now, it wasn’t really possible to run a Manifest backend in production—but that’s changing. With 4.10, we’re opening a new chapter: for the first time, we might start seeing Manifest-powered backends going live! What is Manifest? Manifest is a a AI-friendly micro-backend that powers websites and apps Manifest consists to have a complete backend that fits into a single YAML file, easy to read and modify. From this YAML file, you’re creating All the logic, The data, And the storage. What’s new in 4.10? - Postgres support – Now works with PostgreSQL - Middleware support – Extend functionality as needed - S3 storage compatibility – Handle file uploads seamlessly - Default values – Automatically populate missing fields
Read the rest
- Improved password security – Switched to bcryptjs This is a big step for Manifest, but we know there’s still a long way to go. What do you think? What blockers do you see for using this in production? We’d love to hear your feedback—positive, negative, critical, all of it! If you’ve been following Manifest, this is the moment where things get real. Discussion & full details: https://github.com/mnfst/manifest/discussions/352 Check out the repo: https://github.com/mnfst/manifest
In [dead]
brunaxLorax¡Jan 28, 2025Submission

Manifest – 1k Stars Later

I know that GitHub stars are mostly a vanity metric. Nevertheless it gives some insight about if people have interest in what you do or not. It also goes together with feedback and exchanges that we collect from users. Manifest started as an internal project in our digital agency to become an open source product helping developers to build their backends. I am happy to share our progress today, it is really enjoyable to see a friendly community blossom and see what others are building on top of our product. I am also surprised by the kindness of people in the open source community: we met many incredibly caring people that helped us and told us tips, their own challenges and their way of thinking. As of today Manifest (https://github.com/mnfst/manifest) is still in its early days but we would love to see it grow. 1k stars is meaningless,
Read the rest
as any number of stars if it doesn't fulfill your objectives. However it gives us strength to continue and think "yeah, there's people out there who care, or are at least curious about what we're doing right now". Work is never over :)
1 points ¡ Open discussion

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.