HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
moby
swarmkit
Go2014–2025
moby / swarmkit

swarmkit

A toolkit for orchestrating distributed systems at any scale. It includes primitives for node discovery, raft-based consensus, task scheduling and more.

19Distinct people
24Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
3.7KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A toolkit for orchestrating distributed systems at any scale. It includes primitives for node discovery, raft-based consensus, task scheduling and more.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year24 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2014-06-10 16:38:46 UTC to 2025-06-17 14:24:45 UTC.

0123452014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments20142015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 0 submissions, 5 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC514
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC505
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

24 sources
Eh, it's not quite that simple. What the person above you is thinking of is almost certainly "swarm classic" which is actually dead (see: https://github.com/docker-archive/classicswarm) Docker does support a different "Swarm mode" style deployment configuration, which is functionally https://github.com/moby/swarmkit, and really feels much more like Kubernetes to me than the original docker swarm. I'm... honestly not sure why you'd pick it as a solution over all the k8s tooling they've been doing instead. It feels like the same level of complexity and then only benefit is that it's easier to configure than bare metal k8s, but things like k3s and microk8s tackle that same space. If anyone is really using the swarm mode for a production service, I'd love to hear different opinions, though!
In Show HN: Canine – A Heroku alternative built on Kubernetes
I thought docker-swarm had been considered neglected to the point of dead and without a future for a few years now. Is this impression incorrect/outdated? EDIT: So apparently what used to be known as "Docker Swarm" has been posthumously renamed to "Swarm Classic"/"Classic Swarm" and is indeed dead, abandoned, and deprecated. The project currently known as "Docker Swarm" is a younger completely different project which appears actively maintained. "Classic" still has roughly twice the GH stars and forks compared to the new one. I can't be the only one who's dismissed the latter, assuming it to be the former. Very confusing naming and branding, they would probably have more way more users if they had not repurposed the name like this. https://github.com/docker-archive/classicswarm > Swarm Classic: a container clustering system. Not to be con
Read the rest
fused with Docker Swarm which is at https://github.com/docker/swarmkit
In Show HN: A CLI tool I made to self-host any app with two commands on a VPS
Docker Swarm is getting some more attention after having been neglected, with repo activity going up[1], and Mirantis even publishing a sponsored article on The Next Web[2]. Things look brighter for Swarm than one year ago. Interest in Docker Swarm also persist I think. My post on starting Docker Swarm in 2022 [3] on my very low profile blog gets very regular visits. [1]: https://github.com/moby/swarmkit/commits/master [2]: https://thenewstack.io/docker-swarm-a-user-friendly-alternat... [3]: https://www.yvesdennels.com/posts/docker-swarm-in-2022/
In Show HN: Docker rollout – Zero Downtime Deployment for Docker-compose
I wrote the initial implementation of the raft subsystem and it was definitely not a copy/paste. We started from scratch (using etcd's core raft) with the transport layer being grpc. My initial experiment could be found in this repository [1]. I then took the code from my initial experiment and included this into Swarmkit [2]. From there we went through many iterations on the initial code base and improved the UI with Docker swarm `init`/`join`/`leave` to make the experience of managing the cluster "friendly". We spent quite some time evaluating different raft and paxos implementations (mostly Consul and etcd raft libraries), and found out etcd to be the most stable and flexible for our use case. It was very easy for example to swap the transport layer to use grpc. The fact that etcd implementation is represented as a simple state machine
Read the rest
makes it also much easier to reason about under complex scenarios for debugging purposes, instead of digging into multiple layers of abstractions. In retrospect, this came with quite a learning curve. We've had to deal with issues caused by our own misunderstandings on how to use the library properly. At the same time the fact that the developers favored stability as opposed to user friendliness was exactly what we found attractive using etcd's raft. Additionally, CoreOS developers were super friendly and helpful to help us fix these issues. We've reported and fixed some bugs as well. Kudos to them for all the help they provided at the time. [1] https://github.com/abronan/proton [2] https://github.com/docker/swarmkit/commit/89de50f2092dfd2170...
In Red Hat contributes etcd to the Cloud Native Computing Foundation
Docker staff have been saying words to the effect of "we'll make an announcement with info soon!" for at least the last three+ months, across several projects. Swarm, Docker-Machine, & Infrakit come to mind. With no actual announcement(s) then occurring. The commit activity graph on InfraKit - which people are supposed to use now that Docker-Machine has been deprecated - seems pretty clear: https://github.com/docker/infrakit/graphs/contributors SwarmKit is the same: https://github.com/docker/swarmkit/graphs/contributors Clearly these aren't where resources have been placed. Actions are not lining up with the words given. :(
In K3s: Kubernetes without the features I don't care about
Could it be that the teams are simply focused on adding K8s support and getting the Docker EE out of Beta? Public statement on their blog after the K8s announcement in EU: "But it’s equally important for us to note that Swarm orchestration is not going away. Swarm forms an integral cluster management component of the Docker EE platform; in addition, Swarm will operate side-by-side with Kubernetes in a Docker EE cluster, allowing customers to select, based on their needs, the most suitable orchestration tool at application deployment time." https://blog.docker.com/2017/11/swarm-orchestration-in-docke... There's still plenty of PR's and activity in the SwarmKit and Libnetwork repos: https://github.com/docker/swarmkit/pulse/monthly https://github.com/docker/libnetwork/pulse/monthly
In Cluster and app management services in Docker Cloud are shutting down on May 21

Showing the 15 most recent of 24 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.