HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
modin-project
modin
Python2018–2023
modin-project / modin

modin

Modin: Scale your Pandas workflows by changing a single line of code

12Distinct people
13Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
10.4KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Modin: Scale your Pandas workflows by changing a single line of code

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year13 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2018-07-07 18:57:36 UTC to 2023-06-16 03:18:05 UTC.

024682018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments20182019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 4 submissions, 4 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2023

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC844
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202

What Hacker News says

13 sources
(This is more of a link-dump than a paper discussion --) For the line of inquiry w.r.t tensor compilers and MLIR/LLVM (linalg, polyhedral, [sparse_]tensor, etc), I personally found the following really helpful: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25545373 (links to a survey), https://github.com/merrymercy/awesome-tensor-compilers I also have an interest in the community more widely associated with pandas/dataframes-like languages (e.g. modin/dask/ray/polars/ibis) with substrait/calcite/arrow their choice of IR. Some links: https://github.com/modin-project/modin, https://github.com/dask/dask/issues/8980, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16510610, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35521785 I broadly classify them as such since the former has a stronger disposition towards linear/tensor-algebra, while the latter towards relational al
Read the rest
gebra, and it isn't yet clear (to me) how well innovations in one carry over to the other (if they do), and hence I'm also curious to hear more about proposals for a unified language across linalg and relational alg (e.g. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36349015). I'm particularly interested in pandas precisely because it seems to be right at the intersection of both forms of algebra (and draws a strong reaction from people who are familiar/comfortable with one community and not the other). See e.g. https://datapythonista.me/blog/pandas-20-and-the-arrow-revol... and https://wesmckinney.com/blog/apache-arrow-pandas-internals/
In The Distributed Tensor Algebra Compiler (2022)
Yeah, tried Polars a couple of times: the API seems worse than Pandas to me too. eg the decision only to support autoincrementing integer indexes seems like it would make debugging "hmmm, that answer is wrong, what exactly did I select?" bugs much more annoying. Polars docs write "blazingly fast" all over them but I doubt that is a compelling point for people using single-node dataframe libraries. It isn't for me. Modin (https://github.com/modin-project/modin) seems more promising at this point, particularly since a migration path for standing Pandas code is highly desirable.
In Modern Polars: A comparison of the Polars and Pandas dataframe libraries

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.