HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
mogilefs
mogilefs-docs
Learning & Reference2020–2025
mogilefs / mogilefs-docs

mogilefs-docs

MogileFS official documents

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
13GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

MogileFS official documents

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2020-10-10 12:16:32 UTC to 2025-01-20 17:03:47 UTC.

012020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
S3 became an unofficial de facto standard due to their size, but the relationship will become more adversarial as AWS attempts to prevent leakage. Therefore, there are two parts to this: 1. Storage systems not S3 need to get on the same page for customer benefit wrt protocol and standards for object storage. 2. Users should default to non AWS client side tooling if they want to remain vendor agnostic, otherwise AWS will drag users for their benefit and purposes. This is really no different than the OpenTofo [Terraform fork] & OpenBao [Vault fork] situation imho. Instead of "S3 compatible," it's time to fork and make the de factor standard an open standard, leaving AWS users to have to shim if breaking forward changes occur. (and before S3, it was mogileFS: https://github.com/mogilefs/mogilefs-docs [which powered LiveJournal object storage
Read the rest
almost two decades ago; omg files!])
In Announcement: S3 Default Integrity Change

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.