HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
moovweb
harlem_shaker
CSS2013–2013
moovweb / harlem_shaker

harlem_shaker

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

Explore on GitHubRead Hacker News discussions
3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
184GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2013-02-15 04:09:19 UTC to 2013-05-30 13:18:23 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012013-02-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-02-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsFeb 112013-02-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-02-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-02-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-03-04 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2013-03-04 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-03-11 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-03-11 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-03-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-03-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-03-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-03-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-04-08 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsApr 12013-04-08 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-04-15 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-04-15 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-04-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-04-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-04-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-04-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-05-06 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-05-06 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-05-13 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-05-13 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-05-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-05-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-05-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2013-05-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2013-06-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMay 27

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Feb 112013-02-11 00:00:00 UTC2013-02-18 00:00:00 UTC101
Feb 182013-02-18 00:00:00 UTC2013-02-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 252013-02-25 00:00:00 UTC2013-03-04 00:00:00 UTC110
Mar 42013-03-04 00:00:00 UTC2013-03-11 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 112013-03-11 00:00:00 UTC2013-03-18 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 182013-03-18 00:00:00 UTC2013-03-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 252013-03-25 00:00:00 UTC2013-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 12013-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2013-04-08 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 82013-04-08 00:00:00 UTC2013-04-15 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 152013-04-15 00:00:00 UTC2013-04-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 222013-04-22 00:00:00 UTC2013-04-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 292013-04-29 00:00:00 UTC2013-05-06 00:00:00 UTC000
May 62013-05-06 00:00:00 UTC2013-05-13 00:00:00 UTC000
May 132013-05-13 00:00:00 UTC2013-05-20 00:00:00 UTC000
May 202013-05-20 00:00:00 UTC2013-05-27 00:00:00 UTC000
May 272013-05-27 00:00:00 UTC2013-06-03 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
mattmanser·May 30, 2013
Looks like a fun idea to start, but it's being pitched so badly given paypal's history and the site is actually shockingly bad. The major branding is Twitter's! The links don't work! The design is horrible! It's hosted on Github! This seems to be some muddle of an organization that previously organized something called Charity Hack and Paypals dev evangelists, probably why the whole message is coming across so jarringly at odds with the reality of developing with paypal. At first I thought they had a cool, if out-dated, easter egg, but they seem to have lifted the code without any credit: (enter the konami code or open your console and enter goApeshit(), warning, loud) http://battlehack.org/javascript/ie5.js https://github.com/moovweb/harlem_shaker
In Introducing Battle Hack

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.