HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelfā™§ 0
← Back to top all-time
mortdeus
solana-copy-sniper-mev-trading-bot
Rust2013–2025
mortdeus / solana-copy-sniper-mev-trading-bot

solana-copy-sniper-mev-trading-bot

šŸ†“Free High speed solana mev arbitrage Sniper Copy Trading Bot, gRPC shred stream Pumpfun Bundler, Pumpfun Contract, Yellowston Geyser, token launcher, AI raydium pool creator, volume, sandwich, raydium swap bot, pumpswap auto Volume, Maker bot, 0xblock, best 0 block solana trading bot solana trading bot solana trading bot solana trading bot

20Distinct people
22Mentions
1Explicit recommenders
4.5KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

šŸ†“Free High speed solana mev arbitrage Sniper Copy Trading Bot, gRPC shred stream Pumpfun Bundler, Pumpfun Contract, Yellowston Geyser, token launcher, AI raydium pool creator, volume, sandwich, raydium swap bot, pumpswap auto Volume, Maker bot, 0xblock, best 0 block solana trading bot solana trading bot solana trading bot solana trading bot

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

This is my favorite function :): https://github.com/mortdeus/legacy-cc/blob/936e12cfc756773cb...

ChrisMarshallNY used a recommendation phrase. One indexed comment matches. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC Ā· Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year22 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2013-03-01 21:43:18 UTC to 2025-03-27 02:37:09 UTC.

0123452013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 2 submissions, 3 comments20132014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 1 submissions, 1 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 2 submissions, 0 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 2 submissions, 2 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC523
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC211
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC514
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC220
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC422

What Hacker News says

22 sources
> I like the idea of a small, performant language So the earliest C compilers were under 5000 lines of C+asm: https://github.com/mortdeus/legacy-cc If you want a minimal "standard committee approved" C89 compiler then David Hanson's lcc and Fabrice Bellard's tcc both come out to over 30,000 lines. To understand C89 fully you at a minimum have to read a ~220 page (14,248 line) copy of the (draft) ANSI standard: http://port70.net/~nsz/c/c89/c89-draft.txt I don't know what the smallest C23 compiler would be with all the new features since C89 added, but it's at the point where a single human can't implement a C compiler anymore. It's becoming a language only rich corporations have the wealth and power to implement and steer.
In A simple defer feature for C
For those who wonder, the extract comes from https://github.com/mortdeus/legacy-cc/blob/ccbe90a2803e2cc7e... IMO, it is close to Assembly: * you reserve space and possibly set an original value with "hshsiz DB 100" or "paraml DB ?" * assignment is a different business which involves a runtime instruction (MOV) Hence the same difference (no = sign for the first, passive, compile-time operation; an = sign for the second, active, runtime operation) in this proto-C. (Of course, this doesn't answer your question of "when" did the syntax of those 2 operation fuse :-) )
In Dennis Ritchie’s first C compiler (c. 1972)

Showing the 15 most recent of 22 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.