HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
mozillascience
code-research-object
Science & Engineering2015–2015
mozillascience / code-research-object

code-research-object

Project between GitHub, figshare and Mozilla Science Lab.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
68GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Project between GitHub, figshare and Mozilla Science Lab.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 6:01:08 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-10-01 14:35:30 UTC to 2015-10-01 17:52:10 UTC.

012015-10-01 14:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-01 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsOct 1, 14:002015-10-01 15:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-01 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsOct 1, 15:002015-10-01 16:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-01 17:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-10-01 17:00:00 UTC to 2015-10-01 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsOct 1, 17:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Oct 1, 14:002015-10-01 14:00:00 UTC2015-10-01 15:00:00 UTC101
Oct 1, 15:002015-10-01 15:00:00 UTC2015-10-01 16:00:00 UTC000
Oct 1, 16:002015-10-01 16:00:00 UTC2015-10-01 17:00:00 UTC000
Oct 1, 17:002015-10-01 17:00:00 UTC2015-10-01 18:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

1 sources
Thanks for the reply and the links. The approach taken by Robust links is close to what I had in mind in regards to actually archiving the content. Looks like its a good solution to content drift and it's more passive than webcite. The timestamp benefit is also great. Maybe you could also include some sort of hash on the local end so maybe users could see at a glance if the nearest archive differs at all. Of course that's limited since it uses external archives and might not work with dynamically generated pages. I'll have to check out your comment [0], which seems like a lot of thought went into it, and the research paper. [0]: https://github.com/mozillascience/code-research-object/issue...
In DOI use on Reddit – results from recent dump

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.