HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
mystor
git-revise
Python2019–2026
mystor / git-revise

git-revise

A handy tool for doing efficient in-memory commit rebases & fixups

7Distinct people
8Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
866GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A handy tool for doing efficient in-memory commit rebases & fixups

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 3:38:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year8 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2019-08-06 03:59:49 UTC to 2026-08-11 18:25:39 UTC.

0122019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
I like the look of this. I’ve definitely used git-format-patch and git-am directly so I can edit the diffs directly. Diffing diffs can be fun too. A couple of times in complex rebasings I’ve even needed to go to the point of diffing diff diffs, which is perhaps taking it a bit too far. Another handy extension in this general space is git-revise <https://github.com/mystor/git-revise>, which is roughly git-rebase but without touching the working tree. I use it regularly in crafting artisanal history.
In Show HN: Git-Retext
git-revise is what you want here. It’s rebase, but without touching the working tree. This makes it vastly faster, avoids changing file mtimes (which is very useful property if you have a build system that operates on mtimes, such as make, or something that is watching for file system changes), and if you do need to resolve conflicts it’s easier to confirm that you haven’t changed anything in the final result, because that’ll produce warnings and a dirty index. https://github.com/mystor/git-revise Since learning about this, 90% of my rebase usage has switched to revise, and I’m much happier with it all. I also probably revise commits twice as often as I used to because it’s so much faster and has no file system modification side-effects. When there are conflicts, it only gets you a two-way merge, so that occasionally I reach for rebase to
Read the rest
help with handling non-trivial conflicts from reorderings.
In Git wishlist: aggregate changes across non-contiguous commits (2019)

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.