sm64

re3/revc is going to court largely because they included assets in their repository and advertised derivative works/ports. zret purposefully avoided all of these points making this oot mq decomp. Of course Nintendo can submit a case if they like but it'd be a lot less likely to enter an actual trial like re3/revc. A better comparison would be https://github.com/n64decomp/sm64 which followed the exact same guidelines as this project. Nintendo chased after and DMCA'd many projects based on it but never the original project.

Also Super Mario 64 (mentioned in the article, but here's a direct link) - https://github.com/n64decomp/sm64

From the SM64 decompilation (https://github.com/n64decomp/sm64) 's README: > This repo does not include all assets necessary for compiling the ROMs. A prior copy of the game is required to extract the assets. In other words, the repo only contains the reverse-engineered source code, not any reproductions of Nintendo's copyrighted or trademarked materials. You have to produce those infringing assets yourself—using tools they supply, yes; but also, crucially, by feeding in a copy of the game you already—presumably—have a private-use license for.