HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
nabaz-io
nabaz
HISTORICAL RECORD2022–2022
nabaz-io / nabaz · Not publicly available

nabaz

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

2Distinct people
4Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by week4 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2022-10-12 21:23:32 UTC to 2022-11-16 14:39:59 UTC. Weeks start Monday, UTC.

012022-10-10 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-10-17 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsOct 102022-10-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-10-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2022-10-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-10-31 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsOct 242022-10-31 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-11-07 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-11-07 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-11-14 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2022-11-14 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-11-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsNov 14

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Oct 102022-10-10 00:00:00 UTC2022-10-17 00:00:00 UTC110
Oct 172022-10-17 00:00:00 UTC2022-10-24 00:00:00 UTC101
Oct 242022-10-24 00:00:00 UTC2022-10-31 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 312022-10-31 00:00:00 UTC2022-11-07 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 72022-11-07 00:00:00 UTC2022-11-14 00:00:00 UTC110
Nov 142022-11-14 00:00:00 UTC2022-11-21 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

4 sources
_cfl0·Nov 16, 2022Submission

Show HN: I built a tool to get instant test results

I got sick of the old software development loop: Change code -> Run tests -> wait -> wait some more -> look at failures. I decided to build a tool that will enable you to: Change code -> look at failures. No wait time, no explicit test running. Under the hood: - Runs the whole test suite and collects code coverage per test. - For each auto file save, analyzes the changes on the tests. - Runs changed tests in the background. - Display results, the loop time from change to test results is approx 250ms. Instead of: code -> alt+tab -> arrow up -> rerun all the tests -> wait ... -> test results code -> alt+tab -> test results! Check it out! <https://github.com/nabaz-io/nabaz>
96 points · Open discussion
_cfl0·Nov 9, 2022Submission

Show HN: Hypertest - A test runner for developers with ADHD

TL;DR: a test runner focused on making devs w/ ADHD happy. Hello HN! My name is [redacted], a dev with ADHD. I believe there's different design constraints on tooling for devs with ADHD compared to their "normal"counterparts. That's what I'm here to solve. I gathered experiences of other ADHD devs, to summarize: (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33280461) - Memory: People w/ ADHD have horrendous short term memory (hard to keep grasp of the current *thing/task*) - Distraction: Are easily distracted, tend to fall off the focus wagon easily. - Boring Maintenance: They need and use lists, but are bad at maintaining them. A star would feel awesome (MIT licensed): https://github.com/nabaz-io/nabaz
14 points · Open discussion
_cfl0·Oct 12, 2022Submission

Show HN: We built a tool for fast-forwarding 95% of tests (MIT)

Hi, we are working on a tool for speeding up test runs, by skipping tests unaffected by code changes. Effectivly, Saving 80-95% of the time, by skipping 80-95% of tests. We started a few months ago, and have managed to get into a few production CI systems. All our prospects and users are on holiday right now. So we decided to repackage and open-source for local test running. available here (https://github.com/nabaz-io/nabaz) under MIT license. One line change: pytest -v -> nabaz test --cmdline "pytest -v" Stalk us on GitHub, or just Star us. Ask questions, we'll answer in under 30 seconds. we have auto refresh on.
8 points · Open discussion

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.