HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
nasa
cFE
C2019–2025
nasa / cFE

cFE

The Core Flight System (cFS) Core Flight Executive (cFE)

3Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
534GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

The Core Flight System (cFS) Core Flight Executive (cFE)

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2019-02-18 09:11:13 UTC to 2025-12-29 20:36:08 UTC.

012019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20192020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
The JPL C rules are quite old, but avoiding dynamic allocation outside initialization is am considered best practice for spaceflight software regardless of language. Here's the recommendation from NASA's language-agnostic cFS: 4.2.4 Consolidate Resource Allocations It is generally recommended to consolidate resource allocations to the application initialization function(s). Allocations and setup of resources such as memory pools and child tasks should happen once during initialization in order to provide more determinism during run time. From: https://github.com/nasa/cFE/blob/main/docs/cFE%20Application... The ESA Ada standard also recommends all allocation occur at initialization, and requires exceptions to be justified.
In Static Allocation with Zig
Coding standards can be a pain, but most rules make sense and if they don't make your code difficult to read and unwieldy you should probably create an exception. One example where such an exception would have been justified is found in cFE: https://github.com/nasa/cFE/blob/04c0cc342415575f855dc00960a... Thousands of lines of clutter in the unit tests because they are not using a function-like macro.
In JPL Institutional Coding Standard for the C Programming Language (2009) [pdf]

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.