HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
nathants
libaws
Go2022–2025
nathants / libaws

libaws

just ship on aws

4Distinct people
30Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
453GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

just ship on aws

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 2:04:58 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year30 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2022-05-19 22:27:36 UTC to 2025-04-08 06:56:13 UTC.

0510152022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 17 mentions; 4 submissions, 13 comments20222023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 9 mentions; 0 submissions, 9 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 0 submissions, 3 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC17413
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC909
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC303
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

3 sources
i dunno. moving off heroku to another provider marking up aws or pretending to seems counterproductive. a go binary in a zip builds and uploads to lambda in 1 second. handle routing and everything else in binary, don’t use aws features. you don’t need em. lambda, s3, and dynamo all scale to zero with usage based billing. toss in rds if you really miss sql or dislike scale to zero. once this is too expensive, move to ovh metal, which sells significantly faster compute, ie epyc 4244p ddr5 5200. more importantly, they sell bandwidth for $0.50/TB instead of $0.10/GB, which is aws price before paas wrapper markup. the ovh price is after the 1Gbps unmetered you get for free with any server. most companies will never even need metal, and between lambda and metal is ec2 spot, which might be of use anyway for elasticity. ovh metal bills monthly, e
Read the rest
c2 spot bills by the second. recently i learned ec2 spot in localzones is x2-3 cheaper than standard spot. i only use r5.xlarge in los angeles these days. ovh metal has an old fashioned but perfectly workable api. aws has a great api. spend a few days figuring out a decent sdlc, and then freeze it permanently. it will grow insanely robust over time. i haven’t published my ovh metal workflows. my aws workflows are here[1]. lower overhead means more interesting products coming to market. lower friction definitely doesn’t hurt. viva le renaissance! 1. https://github.com/nathants/libaws
In Moving Off Heroku, Slowly

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.