neomacs

> A small but illustrative example: given a live running clisp program, I can click on a UI element to inspect both the live object and the underlying code in the IDE. I can even copy and paste UI elements! I agree GUI is awkward in Emacs/SLIME. I think the reason is there isn't a standardized GUI framework across the Lisp world. Otherwise people can make SLIME support it. > If I wanted to use slime-fancy to inspect a class, what I get is a dead list of raw text that I have to awkwardly interact with. This part I do not agree. Nowadays "text" in Emacs/SLIME is far from "raw text", there's button that respond to hover, with right click context menu, and can be copy and pasted. I recall some small quirks (like objects in inspector are not presentations) but the only reason they aren't fixed (yet) is nobody get bothered enough. There's rarel

Sure! Sorry for saying something probably totally wrong -- I don't know much about packaging at all. I opened an issue here https://github.com/neomacs-project/neomacs/issues/80

Thanks for your input! I don't org-mode myself but I know it's a killer feature for many. In fact, I think if someone commit to it, they can likely build an even more powerful version of org-mode with a lot less and cleaner code, because Neomacs use arbitrary HTML DOM as its editing representation, and no need for regex/text-property hack. See https://github.com/neomacs-project/neomacs/issues/53 for an example. That being said, Neomacs definitely need a user base and eco-system for that to happen, but I hope so! As for magit, I wish one day Neomacs get one as well. For now one can use Neomacs's built in terminal for git.

The license-less submissions have really ramped up recently :-( Also https://github.com/neomacs-project/neomacs#:~:text=Neomacs%2...