HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
Nerd-Lang
nerd-lang-core
C2026–2026
Nerd-Lang / nerd-lang-core

nerd-lang-core

Introducing NERD - the first intermediate language designed for machine authorship

2Distinct people
3Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
170GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Introducing NERD - the first intermediate language designed for machine authorship

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by 3-hour interval3 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2026-01-01 01:15:17 UTC to 2026-01-03 00:03:28 UTC.

012026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJan 1, 00:002026-01-01 03:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-01 06:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-01 09:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-01 12:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-01 15:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-01 18:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-01 21:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJan 2, 00:002026-01-02 03:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 06:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 09:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 12:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 15:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 18:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-02 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-02 21:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-03 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-03 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-03 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJan 3, 00:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jan 1, 00:002026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 03:00:00 UTC101
Jan 1, 03:002026-01-01 03:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 06:00:00 UTC000
Jan 1, 06:002026-01-01 06:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 09:00:00 UTC000
Jan 1, 09:002026-01-01 09:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 12:00:00 UTC000
Jan 1, 12:002026-01-01 12:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 15:00:00 UTC000
Jan 1, 15:002026-01-01 15:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 18:00:00 UTC110
Jan 1, 18:002026-01-01 18:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 21:00:00 UTC000
Jan 1, 21:002026-01-01 21:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 00:002026-01-02 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 03:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 03:002026-01-02 03:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 06:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 06:002026-01-02 06:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 09:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 09:002026-01-02 09:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 12:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 12:002026-01-02 12:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 15:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 15:002026-01-02 15:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 18:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 18:002026-01-02 18:00:00 UTC2026-01-02 21:00:00 UTC000
Jan 2, 21:002026-01-02 21:00:00 UTC2026-01-03 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 3, 00:002026-01-03 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-03 03:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

3 sources
Creator here. This started as a dumb question while using Claude Code: "Why is Claude writing TypeScript I'm supposed to read?" 40% of code is now machine-written. That number's only going up. So I spent some weekends asking: what would an intermediate language look like if we stopped pretending humans are the authors? NERD is the experiment. Bootstrap compiler works, compiles to native via LLVM. It's rough, probably wrong in interesting ways, but it runs. Could be a terrible idea. Could be onto something. Either way, it was a fun rabbit hole. Contributors welcome if this seems interesting to you - early stage, lots to figure out: https://github.com/Nerd-Lang/nerd-lang-core Happy to chat about design decisions or argue about whether this makes any sense at all.
In Nerd: A language for LLMs, not humans

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.