HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
Netflix
asgard
Groovy2013–2020
Netflix / asgard · Archived

asgard

[Asgard is deprecated at Netflix. We use Spinnaker ( www.spinnaker.io ).] Web interface for application deployments and cloud management in Amazon Web Services (AWS). Binary download: http://github.com/Netflix/asgard/releases

6Distinct people
7Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
2.2KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

[Asgard is deprecated at Netflix. We use Spinnaker ( www.spinnaker.io ).] Web interface for application deployments and cloud management in Amazon Web Services (AWS). Binary download: http://github.com/Netflix/asgard/releases

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year7 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2013-05-20 17:25:18 UTC to 2020-08-18 00:33:41 UTC.

012342013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments20132014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20162017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2020

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC404
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

7 sources
Asgard from Netflix[1] basically did what you are asking for. But it has been deprecated[2] and replaced with Spinnaker[3], which has a bit of a different focus. But really, with couple dozen VMs, you don't have a cloud management problem. I would take a step back and figure out what the problem is, and where you want to be. Why are people creating VMs? What are the problems with them creating VMs? How do you mitigate those problems? If it is just tracking, then tags + education can help solve the issue. If it is security and standardization, an opinionated deployment system could help. With a couple dozen VMs, I'd say you probably shouldn't be running any VMs you manage yourself, and you should be using fully manage solutions. Then focus on the tooling that makes those solutions efficient to use for your users, while meeting your securit
Read the rest
In UI for AWS development VM resources
I'll go too: I've been building a Hubot script for interfacing with Asgard from NetflixOSS. https://github.com/imperialwicket/hubot-asgard I think the chatbot mentality is a good one, as it forces you to script/automate things so that a chatbot can accomplish them. That level of automation is a good target imo. It's also a great way to be certain that you can solve many issues remotely - since you can generally provide a meaningful chatbot command via mobile device. In terms of scaling and cloud (aws) management, Asgard is awesome (seriously - if you're on aws and haven't checked it out, go now: https://github.com/Netflix/asgard/wiki). The biggest complaint I have about Asgard as a tool, is it feels like more than most organizations need; because it is. My goal with the hubot-asgard scripts is to wrap some of the more essential features,
Read the rest
and hide the bulk of the solution that many orgs just see as excess tooling. There's also the Cloud Prize... If anyone is interested and needs assistance or wants particular features that aren't wrapped yet (it's still very young) I'd love to know. And of course - all feedback is welcome and appreciated.
In Ask HN: Share your projects and the stories behind them
Reliability: Amazon makes no guarantee as to the availability / down time / safety of EC2 EC2 Does have SLAs - http://aws.amazon.com/ec2-sla/ Security: Amazon does not makes any guarantee as to whom it will disclose your data Please look at the Security and Data privacy section of the agreement - http://aws.amazon.com/agreement/ Persistence: ensuring persistence of your data (that includes, effort to set up the system) is complicated over EC2 Not sure what this pertains to. Ephemeral storage ? Permanent storage being backed up to S3 ? Management: there are very few integrated management tools for a cloud deployed on EC2 Amazon's web management tool for EC2 is pretty good. Netflix open sourced their tool Asgard which does precisely what this - https://github.com/Netflix/asgard. Perhaps Asgard was not available at the time this comment was
Read the rest
made. The comments on Network and Cost still hold good. Network IO latency can affect throughput severely and cost is not a great win in the long run. Why would you single out EC2 if you were looking at `Cloud computing` ? The question can be broader in nature even though the OP expressed interest in EC2 specifically.
In Why would you not want to use Cloud Computing? (2009)

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.