HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
nodejs
node-chakracore
JavaScript2015–2020
nodejs / node-chakracore · Archived

node-chakracore

Node.js on ChakraCore :sparkles::turtle::rocket::sparkles:

32Distinct people
36Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
1.9KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Node.js on ChakraCore :sparkles::turtle::rocket::sparkles:

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 7:02:50 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year36 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-05-12 18:36:35 UTC to 2020-03-16 17:10:25 UTC.

0510152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 2 submissions, 5 comments20152016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 13 mentions; 4 submissions, 9 comments2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 1 submissions, 6 comments20172018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 0 submissions, 6 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2020

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC725
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC1349
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC716
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC606
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC202
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

7 sources
The problem with the way JXcore did the SpiderMonkey port is their extensive use of C++ macros - not unlike NAN for Node.js. This makes the code hard to debug and maintain. The Microsoft Chakra Node port is more elegant because they've mimicked the V8 C++ API making it much more likely that it will be merged into Node.js and IO.js. In time I suspect Mozilla and other javascript engines will make V8-compatible API shims similar to what Microsoft did: https://github.com/Microsoft/node/tree/ch0.12.2/deps/chakras...
In Temporary fork enables Node.js to optionally use the Chakra JavaScript engine
We decided to fill this gap by allowing Node.js to take advantage of running with the Chakra JavaScript engine Bloody called it. EDIT: https://github.com/Microsoft/node jajajajajajaja Maybe they could throw some developers at making gyp native javascript? EDIT2: Oh wow, the docs are waaaaaay more useful to embedders than V8: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn249536%28v=vs.94%... MSDN continues to be a good friend to developers.
In Bringing Node.js to Windows 10 IoT Core...or swapping out V8 for Chakra

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.