HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
nodejs
TSC
JavaScript2016–2025
nodejs / TSC

TSC

The Node.js Technical Steering Committee

25Distinct people
30Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
693GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

The Node.js Technical Steering Committee

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 6:01:08 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year30 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2016-01-29 09:28:18 UTC to 2025-07-13 00:49:10 UTC.

051015202016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 2 submissions, 1 comments20162017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 21 mentions; 5 submissions, 16 comments2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments20202021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC321
20172017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC21516
20182018-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20192019-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20202020-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20212021-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20222022-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110

From the project README

An excerpt from the repository, fetched Nov 13, 2026.

Read the project’s introduction
Node.js Technical Steering Committee The Node.js Technical Steering Committee (TSC) is the technical governing body of Node.js. It is described in the TSC Charter. TSC scope The TSC is responsible for the Node.js Core project, some projects depended upon by Node.js Core, and several projects adjacent to Node.js Core. The TSC exercises autonomy in managing its responsibilities and seeks agreement from the OpenJS Foundation Board on any change to the scope of those responsibilities as defined below. Node.js Core Node.js Core is defined as the contents of the repository located at https://github.com/nodejs/node from which the node executable and associated packages are built, excluding the vendored projects included in the codebase located in the deps and tools directories that are copied in from externally maintained repositories. Dependent projects Additional projects fall within the TSC's scope of responsibility which are dependencies of Node.js Core in that they are required to plan, test, build, document, and ship Node.js releases. These projects are located in the following repositories: https://github.com/nodejs/TSC https://github.com/nodejs/build — administration delegated to the Build Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/citgm — administration delegated to the Release Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/docker-node — administration delegated to the Docker Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/http-parser — administration delegated to the Core Technical Committee https://github.com/nodejs/node-eps — administration delegated to the Core Technical Committee https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs-dist-indexer — administration delegated to the Build Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs-latest-linker — administration delegated to the Build Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs-nightly-builder — administration delegated to the Build Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org — administration delegated to the Website Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/secrets — private, administration delegated to the Build Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/Release — administration delegated to the Release Working Group Adjacent projects The TSC is responsible for several projects that are not strictly required to plan, test, build, document, and ship Node.js releases. Adjacent projects are either created from within the technical organization managed by the TSC or are adopted into that organization from outside. In the case of adopting existing projects, once the TSC has decided that adoption is appropriate, it should seek agreement from the OpenJS Foundation Board for such adoption as it impacts the scope of technical activities of the Foundation. Current adjacent projects that are within the TSC's scope of responsibility include: https://github.com/nodejs/abi-stable-node — administration delegated to the API Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/abi-stable-node-addon-examples — administration delegated to the API Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/api — administration delegated to the API Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/code-and-learn https://github.com/nodejs/diagnostics — administration delegated to the Diagnostics Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/docs https://github.com/nodejs/education https://github.com/nodejs/email — administration delegated to the Build Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/github-bot https://github.com/nodejs/help https://github.com/nodejs/http https://github.com/nodejs/http2 https://github.com/nodejs/installer https://github.com/nodejs/llnode — administration delegated to the Post Mortem Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/nan — administration delegated to the Addon API Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/node-addon-examples — administration delegated to the Addon API Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/node-chakracore https://github.com/nodejs/node-gyp https://github.com/nodejs/node-inspect — administration delegated to the Diagnostics Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/node-report — administration delegated to the Post Mortem Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/nodejs.org — administration delegated to the Website Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/post-mortem — administration delegated to the Post Mortem Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/promises https://github.com/nodejs/readable-stream — administration delegated to the Streams Working Group https://github.com/nodejs/summit https://github.com/nodejs/testing And various language and resource translation groups under https://github.com/nodejs/ List of TSC responsibilities The TSC exercises autonomy in setting up and maintaining procedures, policies, and management and administrative structures as it deems appropriate for the maintenance and operation of these projects and resources. Included in the responsibilities of the TSC are: Managing code and documentation creation and changes for the listed projects and resources Setting and maintaining standards covering contributions of code, documentation, and other materials Managing code and binary releases: types, schedules, frequency, delivery mechanisms Making decisions regarding dependencies of the Node.js Core project, including what those dependencies are and how they are bundled with source code and releases Creating new repositories and projects under the nodejs GitHub organization as required Setting overall technical direction for the Node.js Core project, including high-level goals and low-level specifics regarding features and functionality Setting and maintaining appropriate standards for community discourse via the various mediums under TSC control Setting and maintaining governance rules for the conduct and make-up of the TSC, Working Groups and other bodies within the TSC's domain Many of these responsibilities will be delegated by the TSC to appropriate bodies such as the Working Groups. TSC members TSC members are responsible for top-level technical community con
Read the full README on GitHub

What Hacker News says

3 sources
Would love to but @izs deleted his tweets a couple of hours later. The entire ordeal happened back in January (I think), around the same time as some other npm drama (e.g. https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/3959 and https://github.com/nodejs/TSC/issues/21 and https://github.com/nodejs/NG/issues/26, leading up to https://github.com/nodejs/NG/issues/29) -- the twitter incident gets referenced in some of the comments. There are however plenty of comments by NPM representatives (including izs) that they see it as a moral obligation to uphold their CoC even beyond the scope of NPM itself (implying what izs proposed). There's a fundamental divide going on between people who think open source (code, not communities) should be attached to certain moral values and those thinking it should be agnostic of social issues. Similar to the Open Source
Read the rest
vs Free Software divide in the 1990s. Except while the FSF was the one arguing on moral grounds before, the new movement is actually in conflict with one of the main concepts of the GPL: authors should not be able to restrict how code can be used and by whom (i.e. you can't prohibit people from using code for evil if it should be GPL compatible).
In I've Just Liberated My Modules

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.