HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
nomad-xyz
monorepo
Solidity2022–2022
nomad-xyz / monorepo

monorepo

Nomad Monorepo -- SDKs, Contracts, and more!

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
125GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Nomad Monorepo -- SDKs, Contracts, and more!

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2022-08-02 17:59:54 UTC to 2022-08-02 20:11:44 UTC.

012022-08-02 17:00:00 UTC to 2022-08-02 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsAug 2, 17:002022-08-02 18:00:00 UTC to 2022-08-02 19:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsAug 2, 18:002022-08-02 19:00:00 UTC to 2022-08-02 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-08-02 20:00:00 UTC to 2022-08-02 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsAug 2, 20:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Aug 2, 17:002022-08-02 17:00:00 UTC2022-08-02 18:00:00 UTC101
Aug 2, 18:002022-08-02 18:00:00 UTC2022-08-02 19:00:00 UTC000
Aug 2, 19:002022-08-02 19:00:00 UTC2022-08-02 20:00:00 UTC000
Aug 2, 20:002022-08-02 20:00:00 UTC2022-08-02 21:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
I don't think this is the same issue as the exploit. The real issue was half-caught in a review on a pull request however. https://github.com/nomad-xyz/monorepo/pull/289/files If this legacy enum value had been handled later in the code, there would not have been a vulnerability. (This isn't to say that the developers were bad. The person who wrote the code was extremely knowledgeable. It's just really hard to be perfect every time. )
In Nomad drained of $150m due to a coding mistake
I've been harping on this part of DeFi for a long time... developers should be writing very good tests. Along with that, security reviews should be followed. This is the review in question [1] where developers ignored the possibility of an issue. This is the commit [2] that likely caused the issue, no tests added. Along with a large chunk of "never brag about your security" hubris [3]. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32319344 [2] https://github.com/nomad-xyz/monorepo/commit/46d14571f3eada6... [3] https://twitter.com/0xemon/status/1554310755071119361
In Nomad drained of $150m due to a coding mistake

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.