HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
NordSecurity
nordvpn-linux
Go2023–2026
NordSecurity / nordvpn-linux

nordvpn-linux

NordVPN Linux client

5Distinct people
6Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
500GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

NordVPN Linux client

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 5:04:57 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year6 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2023-03-14 21:03:27 UTC to 2026-10-12 12:16:55 UTC.

0123452023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 0 submissions, 5 comments20232024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20242025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments. Incomplete calendar period.2026*

* An incomplete calendar period is marked with an outlined bar. Its count is not directly comparable with a full period.

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC505
20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
2026 (partial)2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2027-01-01 00:00:00 UTC110

What Hacker News says

6 sources
usr1106·Oct 12, 2026Submission

Ask HN: What Happened in DNSSEC Yesterday?

I have had DNSSEC verification enabled for a couple of months in systemd-resolved. Not that I am particular paranoid or do any nuclear-sensitive stuff on my machine. Don't even own any Bitcoin. But mostly out of technical curiosity. Until yesterday I had only noticed 2 broken sites (or sites affected by buggy systemd-resolved implementation as some voices claim). Some Jira Plugin and Swedish Railways SJ. Yesterday basically the Internet stopped working for me. After a while I remembered good old operator wisdom "It's always DNS". And it was DNS. Systemd-resolved logged "missing-key" for basically every query I tried. So I switched from DoT 1.1.1.1 @Cloudflare to DoT 8.8.8.8 @Google and life continued. Until today that suddenly out of nowhere showed the same symptom. Turning off DNSSEC verification avoids the problem. An internet search br
Read the rest
ought up https://github.com/NordSecurity/nordvpn-linux/issues/1853 which also links to another one. The timing seems to match with my observation, but I don't use NordVPN. Any clues?
3 points · Open discussion
It's not "well-known"- because your links don't say what you're claiming they do, and this is a conspiracy theory that's been shut down on here a thousand times before. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22532682 NordVPN used residential proxies at one point to enable access to Disney+ and other streaming services; that's a world apart from hijacking end-user connections. They've got an open source client. Where's the code that's turning end users into endpoints? https://github.com/NordSecurity/nordvpn-linux
In Swing VPN app is a DDoS botnet
Hi Vykintas, thank you for answering. I'm the GP. First of all, I want to reiterate that I purposefully used the word "allegedly" because I have no proof. I only have a smoking gun https://archive.is/bQo0O . Second of all, I want to explain that it is very difficult to verify any of your points. > you can easily [...] look through the code. As you can see majority of it is open source. Yes. This is correct, but at the time of writing this comment, the source has been made available only 9 hour ago. https://github.com/NordSecurity/nordvpn-linux The whole thing is one giant "Initial commit" of what looks like millions of lines of code. Auditing this code will take months for single motivated person. There is little to no comments. "Just read the code" is difficult in this context. Also routing traffic through the client can be done just wit
Read the rest
h 2 lines of code enabling kernel ip forwarding, and another line of code adding a nft/iptable rule to nat traffic from NordVPN to the outside world. This is looking for a needle in a haystack if this is obfuscated. Also your Windows and MacOS clients (which are the most used by non-power-users) are not opensource, at the time of writing. So these ones could still be doing what has been alledged. This would be fine, since it's most likely most of your users. > you can easily check it using Wireshark This is also not that easy. If, as alleged, Oxylabs resells millions of NordVPN IPs to thousands of Oxylabs customers, you only have 1/1000 chance to be the botnet of the day. So you would need to be running Wireshark the one day out of 2½ year to see the traffic going through with Wireshark.
In NordVPN library and client code open-sourced

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.