HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
numixproject
numix-gtk-theme
SCSS2015–2015
numixproject / numix-gtk-theme

numix-gtk-theme

A modern flat theme with a combination of light and dark elements.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
1.2KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A modern flat theme with a combination of light and dark elements.

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by 6-hour interval2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2015-07-24 18:10:05 UTC to 2015-08-01 13:56:44 UTC.

012015-07-24 18:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsJul 24, 18:002015-07-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-25 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-25 06:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-25 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-25 12:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-25 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-25 18:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-26 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-26 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-26 06:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-26 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-26 12:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-26 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-26 18:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-27 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-27 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-27 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-27 06:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-27 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-27 12:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-27 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-27 18:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-28 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-28 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-28 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-28 06:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-28 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-28 12:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-28 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsJul 28, 12:002015-07-28 18:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-29 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-29 06:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-29 12:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-29 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-29 18:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-30 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-30 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-30 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-30 06:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-30 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-30 12:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-30 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-30 18:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-31 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-31 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-31 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-31 06:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-31 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-31 12:00:00 UTC to 2015-07-31 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-07-31 18:00:00 UTC to 2015-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-08-01 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-08-01 06:00:00 UTC to 2015-08-01 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2015-08-01 12:00:00 UTC to 2015-08-01 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsAug 1, 12:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jul 24, 18:002015-07-24 18:00:00 UTC2015-07-25 00:00:00 UTC101
Jul 25, 00:002015-07-25 00:00:00 UTC2015-07-25 06:00:00 UTC000
Jul 25, 06:002015-07-25 06:00:00 UTC2015-07-25 12:00:00 UTC000
Jul 25, 12:002015-07-25 12:00:00 UTC2015-07-25 18:00:00 UTC000
Jul 25, 18:002015-07-25 18:00:00 UTC2015-07-26 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 26, 00:002015-07-26 00:00:00 UTC2015-07-26 06:00:00 UTC000
Jul 26, 06:002015-07-26 06:00:00 UTC2015-07-26 12:00:00 UTC000
Jul 26, 12:002015-07-26 12:00:00 UTC2015-07-26 18:00:00 UTC000
Jul 26, 18:002015-07-26 18:00:00 UTC2015-07-27 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 27, 00:002015-07-27 00:00:00 UTC2015-07-27 06:00:00 UTC000
Jul 27, 06:002015-07-27 06:00:00 UTC2015-07-27 12:00:00 UTC000
Jul 27, 12:002015-07-27 12:00:00 UTC2015-07-27 18:00:00 UTC000
Jul 27, 18:002015-07-27 18:00:00 UTC2015-07-28 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 28, 00:002015-07-28 00:00:00 UTC2015-07-28 06:00:00 UTC000
Jul 28, 06:002015-07-28 06:00:00 UTC2015-07-28 12:00:00 UTC000
Jul 28, 12:002015-07-28 12:00:00 UTC2015-07-28 18:00:00 UTC000
Jul 28, 18:002015-07-28 18:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 29, 00:002015-07-29 00:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 06:00:00 UTC000
Jul 29, 06:002015-07-29 06:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 12:00:00 UTC000
Jul 29, 12:002015-07-29 12:00:00 UTC2015-07-29 18:00:00 UTC000
Jul 29, 18:002015-07-29 18:00:00 UTC2015-07-30 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 30, 00:002015-07-30 00:00:00 UTC2015-07-30 06:00:00 UTC000
Jul 30, 06:002015-07-30 06:00:00 UTC2015-07-30 12:00:00 UTC000
Jul 30, 12:002015-07-30 12:00:00 UTC2015-07-30 18:00:00 UTC000
Jul 30, 18:002015-07-30 18:00:00 UTC2015-07-31 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 31, 00:002015-07-31 00:00:00 UTC2015-07-31 06:00:00 UTC000
Jul 31, 06:002015-07-31 06:00:00 UTC2015-07-31 12:00:00 UTC000
Jul 31, 12:002015-07-31 12:00:00 UTC2015-07-31 18:00:00 UTC000
Jul 31, 18:002015-07-31 18:00:00 UTC2015-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 1, 00:002015-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-08-01 06:00:00 UTC000
Aug 1, 06:002015-08-01 06:00:00 UTC2015-08-01 12:00:00 UTC000
Aug 1, 12:002015-08-01 12:00:00 UTC2015-08-01 18:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
The vast majority of third parties GTK+2 themes were using the pixmap engine (or murrine in some cases), which was basically what the current CSS engine is, just more arcane and infinitely less flexible. I reiterate: full stability for theme developers CANNOT be provided, unless you're willing to give away much of the power of the current theming system, basically going back to the annoyingly limited pixmap engine. This (understandably) is not a tradeoff the GTK+ developers are willing to make, and I guess neither third party developers. > Meantime, clunky, terrible C modules written back when GTK 2.10 was a thing work just fine on 2.99. I don't know, I remember Murrine being often broken after new GTK+ releases, despite it being under active development. > https://github.com/shimmerproject/Numix/issues/206 That issue has been opened on 1
Read the rest
0th April, I guess your issue is more than your theme needs more help for its maintenance rather than GTK+'s fault. Again: there's no provision of stability for themes. Either you accept to keep up with upstream or you'd better stick to the default theme. Just like using a greasemonkey script when a website changes. The changes in GTK+ have become progressively less dramatic: this means that fixes for themes are now smaller/simpler, not that they don't need active upstream tracking.
In Firefox nightlies for Linux are now using Gtk+3
Bullshit. Every time a new GTK3 release comes up, the bug trackers of popular themes flare up (many of them obscure, e.g. https://github.com/shimmerproject/Numix/issues/206), various undocumented tidbits and bugs in the theming engine pop up and "innovations" like the client-side decorations are introduced. Meantime, clunky, terrible C modules written back when GTK 2.10 was a thing work just fine on 2.99. That is not simplification. Simplification is when things get easier, not when they get harder.
In Firefox nightlies for Linux are now using Gtk+3

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.