HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
NVIDIA
k8s-device-plugin
Go2023–2025
NVIDIA / k8s-device-plugin

k8s-device-plugin

NVIDIA device plugin for Kubernetes

5Distinct people
5Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
3.9KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

NVIDIA device plugin for Kubernetes

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 8–Nov 15 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/15/2026, 11:34:28 AM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month5 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2023-01-30 13:41:46 UTC to 2025-03-03 04:47:10 UTC.

012023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsJan 20232023-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2023-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2023-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2023-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsFeb 20242024-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2024-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2024-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2024-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 2025

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jan 20232023-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-02-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Feb 20232023-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-03-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Mar 20232023-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 20232023-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-05-01 00:00:00 UTC000
May 20232023-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20232023-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-07-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 20232023-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 20232023-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-09-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Sep 20232023-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 20232023-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-11-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 20232023-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2023-12-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 20232023-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20242024-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-02-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 20242024-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-03-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Mar 20242024-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 20242024-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-05-01 00:00:00 UTC000
May 20242024-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-06-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jun 20242024-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-07-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 20242024-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-08-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Aug 20242024-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-09-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Sep 20242024-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-10-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Oct 20242024-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-11-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Nov 20242024-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2024-12-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 20242024-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20252025-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-02-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Feb 20252025-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-03-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 20252025-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-04-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

1 sources

Show HN: Nos – Open-Source to Maximize GPU Utilization in Kubernetes

Hi HN! I’m Michele Zanotti and today I’m releasing nos, an open-source module to efficiently run GPU workloads on Kubernetes! Nos is meant to increase GPU utilization and cut down infrastructure and operational costs providing 2 main features: 1. Dynamic GPU Partitioning: you can think of this as a cluster autoscaler for GPUs. Instead of scaling up the number of nodes and GPUs, it dynamically partitions them into smaller “GPU slices”. This ensures that each workload only uses the GPU resources it actually needs, resulting in spare GPU capacity that could be used for other workloads. To partition GPUs, nos leverages Nvidia's MPS and MIG [1,2], finally making them dynamic. 2. Elastic Resource Quota management: it allows to increase the number of Pods running on the cluster by allowing teams (namespaces) to borrow quotas of reserved resource
Read the rest
s from other teams as long as they are not using them. Let me know your thoughts on the project in the comments :) Nos addresses some key challenges of Kubernetes tied to the fact that Kubernetes was not designed to support GPU and AI / machine learning workloads. In Kubernetes, GPUs are managed with [3] Nvidia k8s Device Plugin, which has a few major downsides. First, it requires the allocation of an integer number of GPUs per workload, not allowing workloads to request only fractions of GPU. Second, when enabling GPU shared access either with time-slicing or MIG, the device plugin advertises to Kubernetes a fixed set of GPU resources that do not dynamically adapt to the requests of the Pods at each time. This often leads to both underutilized GPUs and pending Pods, and/or the cluster admin having to spend a lot of time looking for workarounds to make the best use of GPUs. For example, consider a company with a k8s cluster with 20 GPUs, where 3 of these GPUs has been reserved to the data science team using Resource Quota objects. In most cases, the workloads of data scientists (notebooks, scripts, etc.) require much less memory/compute resources than those of an entire GPU, yet Kubernetes will force each container to consume an entire GPU. Also, if the team once needs to run a heavy workload, it may want to use as many resources as possible. However, the Resource Quota over their namespace would constrain the team to use at most the 3 GPUs reserved for them, even if the company cluster may be full of unused GPUs! Instead, with nos the data science team would use nos Dynamic GPU Partitioning to request GPU slices so that many workloads can share the same GPU. Also, Elastic Resource Quotas would allow the team to consume more than the 3 reserved GPUs, borrowing quotas from other teams that are not using them. To recap, the team would be able to launch more Pods and the company would likely need fewer nodes. All this with minimal effort required by the cluster admin, who only has to set up nos. Let me know what you think of nos, feedback would be very helpful! :) And please leave a star on GitHub if you like this opensource https://github.com/nebuly-ai/nos Here are some other links that may be useful - Tutorial on how to use Dynamic GPU Partitioning with Nvidia MIG https://towardsdatascience.com/dynamic-mig-partitioning-in-k... - Pros and cons of different technologies for sharing resources among workloads in Kubernetes: time-slicing, MIG, and MPS https://docs.nebuly.com/nos/dynamic-gpu-partitioning/partiti... - Nos documentation https://docs.nebuly.com/nos/overview/ References [1] Multi-Process Service (MPS) https://docs.nvidia.com/deploy/mps/index.html [2] Multi-Instance GPU (MIG) https://docs.nvidia.com/datacenter/tesla/mig-user-guide/ [3] NVIDIA k8s Device Plugin https://github.com/NVIDIA/k8s-device-plugin
2 points · Open discussion

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.