HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
NVIDIA
NemoClaw
TypeScript2026–2026
NVIDIA / NemoClaw

NemoClaw

Run agents like Hermes, LangChain Deep Agents, and OpenClaw more securely inside NVIDIA OpenShell with managed inference

5Distinct people
6Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
23KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Run agents like Hermes, LangChain Deep Agents, and OpenClaw more securely inside NVIDIA OpenShell with managed inference

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by day6 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2026-03-17 10:35:48 UTC to 2026-03-25 21:26:45 UTC.

01232026-03-17 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-18 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsMar 172026-03-18 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-19 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments2026-03-19 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-03-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-21 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-21 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-22 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMar 212026-03-22 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-23 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-23 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-24 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-24 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-25 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-03-25 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-26 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMar 25

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Mar 172026-03-17 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-18 00:00:00 UTC110
Mar 182026-03-18 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-19 00:00:00 UTC312
Mar 192026-03-19 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-20 00:00:00 UTC101
Mar 202026-03-20 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-21 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 212026-03-21 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-22 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 222026-03-22 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-23 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 232026-03-23 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-24 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 242026-03-24 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-25 00:00:00 UTC000
Mar 252026-03-25 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-26 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

6 sources
NemoClaw solves the sandbox problem. The spend problem is still open. OpenShell can block network egress to suspicious-exchange.io, but it doesn’t know that your agent is about to spend $500 there, or that it has already spent $450 today on other endpoints. I built Dreamline for this on-chain spend governance that sits alongside NemoClaw. Before any payment the agent calls /proxy/pay. The blacklist lives in a BNB Chain smart contract, independent of both NemoClaw and Dreamline servers. PR on NemoClaw repo: github.com/NVIDIA/NemoClaw/pull/923
In Nvidia NemoClaw
There's nothing clean about the history. You think commits like [0], with the commit message "improve", count as "clean"? What do you think the motivation for the author would be to modify git history to make it appear that this was written over a weekend, including separating each feature/commit by a few hours, which corresponds to a reasonable amount of time that it may have taken to write that feature? Including a break on Mar 15 at 1:18 AM PDT before continuing to commit at Mar 15 at 12:43 PM PDT. Hey, isn't there a normal human behaviour that occurs around this time every day which takes 6-10 hours? I'm fully aware you can rewrite git history to whatever you want, but this is an occam's razor situation here. You'd only think this wasn't a weekend project if you desperately wanted to believe that this was some major initiative for som
Read the rest
In Nvidia NemoClaw
No they didn't. You can see all the commits as this was built iteratively[0]. This project started development on Saturday morning and now it's here. This is pretty common now, people love to rapidly throw together stuff and show it off a few days later. The only thing different about this from your average Show HN sloppa is that it's living under the NVIDIA Github org, though that also has 700+ repositories[1] in it so they don't appear too discerning about what makes it into the official repo. My best guess is this was an internal hackathon project they wanted to release publicly. [0] https://github.com/NVIDIA/NemoClaw/commits/main/?after=241ff... [1] https://github.com/orgs/NVIDIA/repositories?type=all
In Nvidia NemoClaw

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.