orgmode

Well if you don't do that, you would only have a lowest common denominator system with none of the advanced features, and the world has enough of those. If I wanted to emulate a fraction of org-mode features I use daily in markdown, I would have to use Obsidian with a bunch of plugins, and we would end up in same boat. I don't know the exact spec situation, but I know that comprehensive parsing libraries in modern non-elisp languages exist. An org-mode contributor has one in Julia[1], another in Dart[2] that powers a Flutter app, and there are many tree-sitter grammar based tools that are useable from neovim (e.g. [3]). The basic org2html or org2pdf CLI needs are already addressed by Pandoc. [1] https://github.com/tecosaur/Org.jl [2] https://github.com/amake/org_parser [3] https://github.com/nvim-orgmode/orgmode

nvim-orgmode [1] is also available. Knowledge from emacs orgmode should carry over without much issue. I didn't feel like there was a need to reinvent the wheel like neorg does when there were powerful notetaking solutions available; does anyone have a comparison breakdown of features and capabilities? [1] https://github.com/nvim-orgmode/orgmode