HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
objectiv
objectiv-analytics
HISTORICAL RECORD2022–2022
objectiv / objectiv-analytics · Not publicly available

objectiv-analytics

Discover this repository through its Hacker News conversations.

2Distinct people
2Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

A public description has not been verified.

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by hour2 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2022-05-19 10:45:39 UTC to 2022-05-20 12:31:26 UTC.

012022-05-19 10:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-19 11:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsMay 19, 10:002022-05-19 11:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-19 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-19 12:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-19 13:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-19 13:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-19 14:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-19 14:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-19 15:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-19 15:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-19 16:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-19 16:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-19 17:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-19 17:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-19 18:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-19 18:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-19 19:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-19 19:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-19 20:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-19 20:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-19 21:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-19 21:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-19 22:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-19 22:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-19 23:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-19 23:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-20 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 commentsMay 19, 23:002022-05-20 00:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-20 01:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-20 01:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-20 02:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-20 02:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-20 03:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-20 03:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-20 04:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-20 04:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-20 05:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-20 05:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-20 06:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-20 06:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-20 07:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-20 07:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-20 08:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-20 08:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-20 09:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-20 09:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-20 10:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-20 10:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-20 11:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-20 11:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-20 12:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2022-05-20 12:00:00 UTC to 2022-05-20 13:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsMay 20, 12:00

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
May 19, 10:002022-05-19 10:00:00 UTC2022-05-19 11:00:00 UTC110
May 19, 11:002022-05-19 11:00:00 UTC2022-05-19 12:00:00 UTC000
May 19, 12:002022-05-19 12:00:00 UTC2022-05-19 13:00:00 UTC000
May 19, 13:002022-05-19 13:00:00 UTC2022-05-19 14:00:00 UTC000
May 19, 14:002022-05-19 14:00:00 UTC2022-05-19 15:00:00 UTC000
May 19, 15:002022-05-19 15:00:00 UTC2022-05-19 16:00:00 UTC000
May 19, 16:002022-05-19 16:00:00 UTC2022-05-19 17:00:00 UTC000
May 19, 17:002022-05-19 17:00:00 UTC2022-05-19 18:00:00 UTC000
May 19, 18:002022-05-19 18:00:00 UTC2022-05-19 19:00:00 UTC000
May 19, 19:002022-05-19 19:00:00 UTC2022-05-19 20:00:00 UTC000
May 19, 20:002022-05-19 20:00:00 UTC2022-05-19 21:00:00 UTC000
May 19, 21:002022-05-19 21:00:00 UTC2022-05-19 22:00:00 UTC000
May 19, 22:002022-05-19 22:00:00 UTC2022-05-19 23:00:00 UTC000
May 19, 23:002022-05-19 23:00:00 UTC2022-05-20 00:00:00 UTC000
May 20, 00:002022-05-20 00:00:00 UTC2022-05-20 01:00:00 UTC000
May 20, 01:002022-05-20 01:00:00 UTC2022-05-20 02:00:00 UTC000
May 20, 02:002022-05-20 02:00:00 UTC2022-05-20 03:00:00 UTC000
May 20, 03:002022-05-20 03:00:00 UTC2022-05-20 04:00:00 UTC000
May 20, 04:002022-05-20 04:00:00 UTC2022-05-20 05:00:00 UTC000
May 20, 05:002022-05-20 05:00:00 UTC2022-05-20 06:00:00 UTC000
May 20, 06:002022-05-20 06:00:00 UTC2022-05-20 07:00:00 UTC000
May 20, 07:002022-05-20 07:00:00 UTC2022-05-20 08:00:00 UTC000
May 20, 08:002022-05-20 08:00:00 UTC2022-05-20 09:00:00 UTC000
May 20, 09:002022-05-20 09:00:00 UTC2022-05-20 10:00:00 UTC000
May 20, 10:002022-05-20 10:00:00 UTC2022-05-20 11:00:00 UTC000
May 20, 11:002022-05-20 11:00:00 UTC2022-05-20 12:00:00 UTC000
May 20, 12:002022-05-20 12:00:00 UTC2022-05-20 13:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

2 sources
Thanks for the detailed comments. To create the first version of the taxonomy, we looked at the 50 companies we worked with doing modeling on their existing analytics data (from GA, Adobe, Mixpanel etc) and mapped their product UI’s and data team requirements into one extensible data format. In your examples, the taxonomy would classify these as interactive user actions, with a PressEvent on a Pressable UI element. This way, models can work both on the GitHub and HN examples in one generic way, so there is no need to come up with very case-specific naming and map these once you build a model. If you still have use-cases that are not covered, the taxonomy is also extensible, which enables you to use our validation & data modeling. About replacing components: no need to do this if you don't want to, you can either: A) Swap native component
Read the rest
s without having to code anything, using the premade Tracked<Component> for a specific platform (e.g. `<TrackedButton onClick={handleClick}>Click Me!</TrackedButton>`); or B) Use your own component of your liking (i.e. Next.js' Link) and wrap a TrackedContext around it that automatically triggers an Event (e.g. see https://objectiv.io/docs/tracking/react/api-reference/tracke...). We're big fans of Snowplow for scalability and have an early integration where you can run Objectiv data straight into a SP pipeline https://github.com/objectiv/objectiv-analytics/tree/main/bac...
In Show HN: Objectiv – Open-source product analytics infrastructure
thejansen·May 19, 2022Submission

Show HN: Objectiv – Open-source product analytics infrastructure

Hi! One of the creators here. Very proud to finally be able to show you what we've been working on for over a year now. Curious to hear your thoughts! Objectiv is open-source (APLv2) product analytics infrastructure. It's built around a generic but strict event taxonomy, open/common data- and infra tools (currently PG, snowplow, working on bigquery with more to come), and the analyses are done using our pandas-like, SQL speaking modeling library called Bach. As a result, we’re moving towards a vision wherein models can be shared openly, independent of product, platform[1] or data platform[2]. How? - Fully assist the dev doing the instrumentation using tools for ide support, run-time validation, ci integration. No auto capture, but very low-effort[1] instrumentation. - Scale using proven tech: a single collector writing to PG for small or
Read the rest
snowplow to anything[2] for big. - Feed data into your own data warehouse after validation. - No tracking plan, but an open event taxonomy designed for modeling, that fits most user interfaces out of the box or can be extended otherwise. - Take some of our pre-built models off the shelf or use Bach directly to model on the raw data in a notebook. - Bach generates SQL for the target platform: productionize without lock-in, feed to a BI system, dbt, etc. Where? Github: https://github.com/objectiv/objectiv-analytics Docker demo: https://objectiv.io/docs/home/quickstart-guide/ Website/docs: https://objectiv.io/ Let me know what you think and what platform/SQL backend you’d like to see supported first. [1] Currently on plain js, react, angular, react native. Future: vue, native android/ios. [2] Once we’re done building Bach support for all SQL platforms. Now: PG, bigquery in development. Future: redshift, clickhouse, athena, etc.
88 points · Open discussion

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.