HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
observing
balancerbattle
JavaScript2013–2016
observing / balancerbattle

balancerbattle

WebSocket loadbalancer battle

5Distinct people
6Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
854GitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

WebSocket loadbalancer battle

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use has been verified yet.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:03:16 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by year6 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2013-04-09 10:46:33 UTC to 2016-01-06 17:50:17 UTC.

0123452013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 comments20132014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments20142015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2016

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
20132013-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC514
20142014-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20152015-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
20162016-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2017-01-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

6 sources
It would be interesting to see the difference with HAProxy if this line was removed: https://github.com/observing/balancerbattle/blob/master/hapr... What the option does is close the connection between the proxy and the backend so that HAProxy will analyse further requests instead of just forwarding to the already established connection. To be fair, I don't know what nginx does - whether connections are kept open or shut down - so I'm not sure that it'd be a fair comparison. Also interesting are the HAProxy built in SSL times. I'm surprised they're so slow. Perhaps the cipher is also the culprit. The cipher can also be specified in HAProxy. bind *:8080 ssl crt /root/balancerbattle/ssl/combined.pem ciphers RC4-SHA:AES128-SHA:AES:!ADH:!aNULL:!DH:!EDH:!eNULL
In Balancer Battle – Load testing HAproxy, Nginx and HTTP-Proxy's WebSocket support
Are you referring to the cipher verification? I used: openssl s_client -host localhost -port 8082 Which is a openssl command. These settings were used for testing SSL: https://github.com/observing/balancerbattle/blob/master/ngin... See https://gist.github.com/3rd-Eden/5345018 for the output of the openssl s_client for those ciphers. You'll see that `cipher : RC4-SHA` is used here. Which is one of the fastest if not the fastest cipher available.
In Balancer Battle – Load testing HAproxy, Nginx and HTTP-Proxy's WebSocket support

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.