HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
omacom
omarchy
Shell2025–2026
omacom / omarchy

omarchy

Beautiful, Modern & Opinionated Linux

31Distinct people
35Mentions
0Explicit recommenders
46.9KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Beautiful, Modern & Opinionated Linux

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

No recommendation phrase was found in the indexed comments.

No classified warning is attached to this page. Read the discussions before treating silence as approval.

Also in these discussions

No other repository is repeatedly linked in the same discussions.

This week on Hacker News

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 3:56:07 PM UTC.

No direct repository links were found in the indexed HN discussions over the past seven days. Older discussions are available below.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month35 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2025-06-28 01:42:04 UTC to 2026-10-25 12:39:36 UTC.

024682025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsJun 20252025-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2025-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 1 submissions, 3 comments2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 7 mentions; 2 submissions, 5 comments2025-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 6 mentions; 1 submissions, 5 comments2025-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 comments2026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 commentsFeb 20262026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 0 submissions, 2 comments2026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 0 mentions; 0 submissions, 0 comments2026-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 1 submissions, 0 comments2026-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 2 submissions, 6 comments2026-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 2 mentions; 2 submissions, 0 comments2026-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 1 mentions; 0 submissions, 1 commentsOct 2026

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Jun 20252025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-07-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Jul 20252025-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-08-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Aug 20252025-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC413
Sep 20252025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-10-01 00:00:00 UTC725
Oct 20252025-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-11-01 00:00:00 UTC615
Nov 20252025-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Dec 20252025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jan 20262026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC101
Feb 20262026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Mar 20262026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Apr 20262026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-05-01 00:00:00 UTC000
May 20262026-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC202
Jun 20262026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-07-01 00:00:00 UTC000
Jul 20262026-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-08-01 00:00:00 UTC110
Aug 20262026-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-09-01 00:00:00 UTC826
Sep 20262026-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-10-01 00:00:00 UTC220
Oct 20262026-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-11-01 00:00:00 UTC101

What Hacker News says

35 sources
To be clear I'm accusing the distro to steer people in a certain direction, I'm arguing that it's something that people who already have a certain set of political beliefs will be drawn to. >That you think it's all about UNIX guru LARP I have to question how many Omarchy users you actually engaged with because I've mostly met humble and friendly folks. YMMV. I mostly base myself on the tweet wall posted on Omarchy's website, because it features (or featured, back when I looked at it) a bunch of former Mac users patting themselves on the back for being such 1337 h4x0rs for... mainly using a tiling WM, as far as I can tell. As someone who has been using Linux and tiling WMs for over two decades it's a bit baffling to look at frankly. I guess I'm a bit salty that I missed out on millions of dollars by sharing my config files. >I've been work
Read the rest
ing a lot on customization and upstreamed some patches and I have no idea what would count as poorly configured. I obviously haven't surveyed the entire ecosystem but the base scripts shipped with the distro (which I presume are mostly DHH's work) look more like a personal dotfile compendium than something a serious distro would ship. I'm talking about stuff like this: https://github.com/omacom/omarchy/blob/1e859d37cb7fef6ac6874... That "format-drive" function is particularly entertaining, I think. Regarding third party code, the small handful of github projects I looked at were the most spaghetti of vibecode, e.g. https://github.com/ETroll/omarchy-airplay/blob/master/bin/om... This may not be representative of the ecosystem at large, admittedly, but given the huge focus on vibecode/agentic stuff in the marketing, I think this is not an unexpected outcome. Beyond that, using your own, worse package manager instead of leveraging Arch's existing capabilities (but also still using Arch's packages for some things) is just terrible design.
In OBS Studio 33
That remains to be seen. The whole concept is still in its infancy. An AI reviewer should have caught these issues when they were PRs. But you see, it wasn't even a PR. It was just DHH making a straight up commit on the main branch (as far as I can see). With a message "Do all the additional Docker configuration needed". Was it even AI-assisted? At least the commit message wasn't, AIs write smarter commit messages than that. I said on my earlier comment that DHH and AI get ridiculed automatically because people hate both. That doesn't mean that the ridicule isn't always justified. https://github.com/omacom/omarchy/commit/25799ee91f54c35e6d3...
In Omarchy: Any User Process Can Escalate to Root
It’s a bit more than Arch. There are a bunch of programs written in shell and QML/JavaScript. I guess at least they are using memory-safe languages, but shell scripts make it easier to write the type of shell-injection bug mentioned in the article. Personally if I started a new project in 2026, I would not choose bash and vanilla JavaScript as the languages to write it in. The repo for reference: https://github.com/basecamp/omarchy
In Omarchy development practices lead to predictable security issues
It's AI and dev forward in a brilliant way. It ships with its own skill [1], so agents actually work way better out of the box than on other distros. Something crashes? Click the notification and your agent solves the bug. It also has a very standardized UI library and a good plugin system. Due to those things the list of plugins is increasing by hundreds a day [2], I made one that adds Exposé like for macOS myself a few days ago. Most of them are actually good, and unlike other distros they look visually consistent. Customizing your system and participating in the community has never been this easy. Incredibly fun, feels like being a kid in a candyshop. [1] https://github.com/basecamp/omarchy/blob/quattro/default/age... [2] https://omarchyplugins.com/
In Omarchy development practices lead to predictable security issues
I agree with the author's general sentiment, but I would give Omarchy credit for some design features that I find either really innovative or well executed. I find the launch menu the most interesting I've seen out of any desktop environment / OS. It puts easy access to your apps front and center and above esthetics, and yet it still looks great. It's not a sane request, but I'd love to be able to swap the launcher/start menu in another DE for a fully customizable version of that. Omarchy also has a very smooth way to 'install' web apps. There exist packages that do that for you, but I've tested several and wouldn't recommend any of them. They're bloated (this should really only be a couple lines of bash, like Omarchy's [0]), some use web views (I really want an actual browser under the hood so I can have my extensions), and all that I've
Read the rest
tested leave litter on your machine after removing apps or the software. I find web apps as .desktop files so useful that I'm actually using a hacky DIY script now (which I'm considering releasing under GPL if I ever find time to clean it up). Also, whether you're a beginner or a pro, having a sane starting config for Hyprland is just convenient. Which tells you something about it imho. My conclusion would be similar to the OP's, if you're Omarchy-curious, try Cosmic on your distro of choice. Or at least a cleaned up version with the most egregious personal preferences (like a global keybind for opening Twitter/X) removed, if anybody cares to maintain that. [0] https://github.com/basecamp/omarchy/blob/dev/bin/omarchy-web...
In Omarchy Is Not A Distro

Showing the 15 most recent of 35 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.