DesktopEditors

OnlyOffice didn't distribute under a pure AGPLv3 license. They made modifications to it. On line 655 here: https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/DocumentServer/blob/master/LIC... > Pursuant to Section 7(b) of the License you must retain the original Product logo when distributing the program. Pursuant to Section 7(e) we decline to grant you any rights under trademark law for use of our trademarks. And on line 17 here: https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/DesktopEditors/blob/master/LIC... > Pursuant to Section 7 § 3(b) of the GNU AGPL you must retain the original ONLYOFFICE logo in the upper left corner of the user interface when distributing the software. IANAL, but from the wording above it appears that OnlyOffice has modified it in a way that makes it impossible to fork as a new project.

I've been using OnlyOffice lately. I'm not a hardcore office user so maybe someone else can comment on how it is compared to Libre/MS Office. https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/DesktopEditors

recent concerns from https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/onlyoffice >> Since Qt5 is now already outdated, > Yes, every dependency onlyoffice uses is outdated. They even use v8 8.9 that doesn't include any security patches. They also uses outdated CEF binary downloaded from an http url and doesn't check its integrity at all. Even worse, that CEF binary might be closed source as suggested by dbermond in https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/DesktopEditors/issues/1664 > I would advise anyone who uses onlyoffice to avoid opening any untrusted documents with it. It appears that onlyoffice upstream doesn't care about security at all. See https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/DesktopEditors/issues/1664 for more details

What's everyone's opinion on OnlyOffice? It seems to have a much more polished UI than LibreOffice. https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/DesktopEditors

Their browser-based self-hosted solution has optional closed-source components, but the desktop app is pretty much open source: https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/DesktopEditors The development model is a bit sketchy (e. g. they have a separate private issue tracker and sometimes ignore tickets in their open source repos), but the sources are there.

Sure are. https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/DesktopEditors The headless server is Apache, the client and visual elements AGPL, which might be the confusion.

Additionally, there is https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/DesktopEditors I personally find it a bit easier to use with better docx support.

Yes, there are several. All three of the following are free of charge on Linux. OnlyOffice is an open source office suite that has native support for Microsoft Office formats (.docx, .xlsx, .pptx). There is a desktop version that works offline and an online version that integrates with Nextcloud. There are also mobile apps (closed source). Home page: https://www.onlyoffice.com Download: https://www.onlyoffice.com/download-desktop.aspx GitHub: https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/DesktopEditors WPS Office (previously known as Kingsoft Office) is a closed source office suite that works on Linux. The software is quite popular in China, and the Android app has over 100 million downloads on the Play Store. Homepage: https://www.wps.com/office/linux Download: http://wps-community.org/downloads Flatpak: https://flathub.org/apps/details/com.wps.Office F