HackerReposA FIELD GUIDE TO OPEN SOURCE
ProSponsor the shelf♧ 0
← Back to top all-time
openai
codex
Rust2025–2026
openai / codex

codex

Lightweight coding agent that runs in your terminal

163Distinct people
218Mentions
2Explicit recommenders
135.1KGitHub stars
REPOSITORY AT A GLANCE

What to know before exploring

What it is

Lightweight coding agent that runs in your terminal

GitHub

Where it is used

No documented product use was verified in the last source check.

What people are saying

I love the fact that they're advertising the latest Codex Cli while most Windows users had to rollback/downgrade to an older version because of the annoying excessive terminal…

coverband used a recommendation phrase. 2 indexed comments match. This is a phrase match, not a verdict.

Critical Commenters criticize the repository for excluding .NET support by default and for rejecting community contributions with poor communication. Other comments highlight a specific bug where the model accidentally truncated its thinking process due to efficiency improvements.

A warning from this week’s discussion. Read the supporting reply

Also in these discussions

Mentioned in the same Hacker News threads. That is not proof they are substitutes.

This week on Hacker News

Critical

Commenters criticize the repository for excluding .NET support by default and for rejecting community contributions with poor communication. Other comments highlight a specific bug where the model accidentally truncated its thinking process due to efficiency improvements.

Supporting reply 1 · Supporting reply 2 · 3 discussions summarized

Nov 7–Nov 14 UTC · Direct repository links and separately labeled related project stories. Indexed through 11/14/2026, 1:49:46 PM UTC.

Announcing .NET 11 direct repository linkDebated

The discussion is characterized by a split between praise for .NET 11's technical features and severe criticism of Microsoft's aggressive upgrade cycle, alongside a contentious debate comparing C#'s complexity against Go's simplicity. Participants disagree on whether the ecosystem's maturity justifies the migration burden and argue over specific language design choices like ConfigureAwait and generics.

306 readable replies · Supporting reply 1 · Supporting reply 2 · Supporting reply 3 · Supporting reply 4 · Supporting reply 5 · Supporting reply 6 · Supporting reply 7 · Supporting reply 8

Showing the three threads with the most distinct people linking this repo, from 31 threads this week.

Mentions over time

HN mentions by month218 dated mentions

Observed mentions: 2025-04-16 17:17:12 UTC to 2026-10-27 23:04:47 UTC.

0102030402025-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 11 mentions; 2 submissions, 9 commentsApr 20252025-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 comments2025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 10 mentions; 3 submissions, 7 comments2025-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 5 mentions; 1 submissions, 4 comments2025-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 4 mentions; 0 submissions, 4 comments2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 2 submissions, 6 comments2025-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 3 mentions; 1 submissions, 2 comments2025-11-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 12 mentions; 6 submissions, 6 comments2025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 8 mentions; 2 submissions, 6 comments2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 13 mentions; 4 submissions, 9 commentsJan 20262026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 14 mentions; 6 submissions, 8 comments2026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 9 mentions; 1 submissions, 8 comments2026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-05-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 14 mentions; 6 submissions, 8 comments2026-05-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 9 mentions; 2 submissions, 7 comments2026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-07-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 15 mentions; 6 submissions, 9 comments2026-07-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-08-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 41 mentions; 10 submissions, 31 comments2026-08-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-09-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 11 mentions; 6 submissions, 5 comments2026-09-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-10-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 10 mentions; 1 submissions, 9 comments2026-10-01 00:00:00 UTC to 2026-11-01 00:00:00 UTC (exclusive): 16 mentions; 4 submissions, 12 commentsOct 2026

Counts come from the repository’s dated source evidence. Index cutoff: 2026-11-02 08:16:59 UTC.

View mention counts and date ranges
UTC ranges include their start and exclude their end. Select a period to filter the source evidence.
PeriodStart (UTC)End (exclusive, UTC)MentionsSubmissionsComments
Apr 20252025-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-05-01 00:00:00 UTC1129
May 20252025-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC514
Jun 20252025-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-07-01 00:00:00 UTC1037
Jul 20252025-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-08-01 00:00:00 UTC514
Aug 20252025-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC404
Sep 20252025-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-10-01 00:00:00 UTC826
Oct 20252025-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-11-01 00:00:00 UTC312
Nov 20252025-11-01 00:00:00 UTC2025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC1266
Dec 20252025-12-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC826
Jan 20262026-01-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC1349
Feb 20262026-02-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC1468
Mar 20262026-03-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC918
Apr 20262026-04-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-05-01 00:00:00 UTC1468
May 20262026-05-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC927
Jun 20262026-06-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-07-01 00:00:00 UTC1569
Jul 20262026-07-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-08-01 00:00:00 UTC411031
Aug 20262026-08-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-09-01 00:00:00 UTC1165
Sep 20262026-09-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-10-01 00:00:00 UTC1019
Oct 20262026-10-01 00:00:00 UTC2026-11-01 00:00:00 UTC16412

What Hacker News says

218 sources
Your LLM can replace your cargo build with bazel in a few sessions. Queue the bazel-haters on HN... The rust support has gotten really good, and the maintainer for the rust rules works at OpenAI, which, incidentally, is how at least parts of OpenAI builds rust and wasm: https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/main/MODULE.bazel. I have a pretty complex rust backend in my project. I rent a capable bare-metal build server that costs about $150/mo that powers all my personal CI. All it does is start a systemd service for gh actions self-hosted runner. I can build and release this project in around 2-4 minutes, where before even a local dev iteration cycle would be up to around 10 minutes, much less building and releasing the whole thing, which was around an hour.
In One year of Dioxus fullstack in production: the good, the painful
My complaint applies specifically to the CLI. I have never used the gui app. Here are the various goal-breaking bugs I've run into: - Goals get blocked due to .git and other stuff becoming randomly read-only when daemon auto-updates in the background (the linked issue in my comment above) - Goals get blocked due to transient "Selected model is at capacity" - Goals get blocked due to "Codex ran out of room in the model's context window". Somehow, both auto-compaction and manually running /compact don't work. https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/52567#issuecomment-61... - Goals get blocked due to bwrap randomly failing with `bwrap: loopback: Failed RTM_NEWADDR: Operation not permitted`. I traced this one to `apparmor` on Ubuntu 24.04 interfering with bwrap and found a local workaround.
In Codex CLI installs a persistent, self-updating background daemon by default
Yep, the real issue is that it was something they didn’t have before, and then with Codex 0.157.0 enabled, they installed this persistent nonsense [1] that survives after the last instance of Codex has exited on your machine, which is just gross. codex features disable daemon_auto_start codex app-server daemon stop pkill -f 'app-server daemon pid-update-loop' [1] - https://github.com/openai/codex/issues/48195
In Codex CLI installs a persistent, self-updating background daemon by default
There aren't any documented settings to disable this, but there is a feature flag it currently sits behind. You can flip it in your ~/.codex/config.toml[1]: [features] daemon_auto_start = false There are also some files that it writes to in ~/.codex at startup: pid files, lock files, things like that. You can delete them and replace them with symlinks to /dev/null, then mark those unwritable with `chattr +i` or similar. Presumably then the background daemon will crash on startup, if the feature flag ever goes away. -- 1: https://github.com/openai/codex/blob/0c329ad2c9d5a2592128a1d...
In Codex CLI installs a persistent, self-updating background daemon by default

Showing the 15 most recent of 218 sources. Enable JavaScript to search and browse every indexed mention.

MAKE YOURSELF AT HOME

A few shortcuts

/
Search the collection
?
Open this guide
Esc
Close dialogs and navigation

Your saved repositories and interests stay in this browser.